Sunday, August 31, 2025

TAWEEWAT WANTHA'S FILMS IN MY PREFERENTIAL ORDER

 

รศ. ดร. ชุติมา ประกาศวุฒิสาร เขียนบทความยาว 59 หน้าเกี่ยวกับหนังเรื่อง BY THE TIME IT GETS DARK ดาวคะนอง (2016, Anocha Suwichakornpong) ลงใน “วารสารศาสตร์” กรี๊ดดดดดดดดดดดด ผู้สนใจสามารถดาวน์โหลดบทความอ่านได้เลย (ลิงค์อยู่ในคอมเมนท์)

https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jcmag/article/view/287871

 +++++

เพิ่งพบว่าตัวเองเคยดูหนังเรื่อง A GOOD PERSON คนดี (1998, Taweewat Wantha, 37min) ในวันที่ 15 ส.ค. 1998 ด้วย แต่เราจำอะไรในหนังเรื่องนี้ไม่ได้แล้ว กรี๊ดดดดดดดดดดดดดดด มีใครจำอะไรในหนังเรื่องนี้ได้ไหมคะ

 

บุคคลอีกท่านหนึ่งที่น่าจะได้เคยดูหนังเรื่องนี้แล้วแน่ ๆ ก็คือคุณมโนธรรม เพราะคุณมโนธรรมเป็นกรรมการตัดสินรางวัลหนังสั้นในปี 1998 😊

 

สรุปว่าตอนนี้เราได้ดูหนังของคุณทวีวัฒน์ วันทา ไป 8 เรื่อง เรียงตามลำดับความชอบในตอนนี้ได้ดังนี้

 

1. DEATH WHISPERER (2023)

 

2. ATTACK 13 (2025)

 

3.THA RAE: THE EXORCIST (2025)

 

4.THE SPERM (2007)

 

5.DEATH WHISPERER 2 (2024)

 

6.SARS WARS (2004)

 

7.LONG WEEKEND (2013)

 

8.A GOOD PERSON คนดี (1998)

 

เรายังไม่ได้ดู THE KINDERGARTEN (2009)

 

Friday, August 29, 2025

THAI SHORT FILMS 1999

 

ซื้อตั๋ว SHANGHAI BLUES ไว้แล้ว แต่ก็คงต้องทิ้งตั๋วไป เพราะอยากดู UTOPIANS (2015, Scud) กับ AMPHETAMINE (2010, Scud) มากกว่า อะไรคือการที่หนังฮ่องกงฉายชนกันเอง แล้วดันเป็น ฉีเคอะ กับ Scud ซึ่งถือเป็นผู้กำกับที่เราบูชาทั้งคู่ สวรรค์ช่างกลั่นแกล้ง ผู้หญิงคนนั้นชื่อ “บุญมีแต่กรรมบัง”

 

แต่ดู SHANGHAI BLUES ทาง MUBI แทนก็ได้ ฮือ ฮือ ฮือ

 

 แล้วอะไรคือการที่เราอยากดู Germaine Dulac กับ Jean Epstein ใน “เทศกาลหนังเงียบ” แต่มันก็ชนกับ Scud ใน “เทศกาลหนังเงี่ยน” #ดูหนังในเทศกาลภาพยนตร์จนเป็นบ้า

++++++

ถ้าจำไม่ผิด ชั้นล่างของตึกซ้ายมือเป็น "ห้องสมุด" และเราเข้าไปอ่านนิทานแปลใน "สตรีสารภาคพิเศษ" ในห้องสมุดนี้เป็นประจำ จำได้ว่านิทานสนุกมากๆ เรื่องของ "พ่อมด" ที่เข้าแข่งขันในงานประกวด magicians เพราะเขานึกว่าต้องใช้ magic จริง ๆ ในการประกวด อะไรทำนองนี้ เสียดายที่เราไม่รู้ชื่อภาษาอังกฤษและภาษาไทยของนิทานเรื่องนี้ เพราะเราน่าจะได้อ่านมันในราว ๆ ปี 1980 หรือเมื่อ 45 ปีที่แล้ว มีใครรู้ชื่อของนิทานเรื่องนี้ใน "สตรีสารภาคพิเศษ" บ้างไหมคะ

+++

 

วันนี้หยิบสูจิบัตรเทศกาลหนังสั้นปี 1999 ขึ้นมาพลิกดูเล่น ๆ แล้วก็ร้องวี้ดสุดเสียง เพราะว่ารายชื่อผู้กำกับแต่ละคนที่เคยแข่งขันกันชิงรางวัล “ภาพยนตร์สั้นยอดเยี่ยมที่กำกับโดยบุคคลทั่วไป” หรือรางวัลรัตน์ เปสตันยี ในปีนั้น ถือว่าเป็นการรวมดาวสาวสยามครั้งรุนแรงมากเลยนะ เพราะผู้กำกับที่แข่งขันกันในปีนั้นมีทั้ง Apichatpong Weerasethakul, Kongdej Jaturanrasamee, Boonsong Nakphoo, Chartchai Ketnust, นิวัต พุทธประสาท, Teekhadet Vucharadhanin, Pleo Sirisuwan, Michael Shaowanasai, Jumpoth Ruayjaroensap, Kulachat Jitkajornvanich

 

หนังที่แข่งขันกันชิงรางวัล รัตน์ เปสตันยี ในปีนั้น รวมถึง

 

1. THE ADVENTURE OF IRON PUSSY EPISODE II BUNZAI CHAIYO (1999, Michael Shaowanasai)

 

2. DIARY 02: OCTOBER 1999 (1999, Chartchai Ketnust)

 

3. DOWN ลง (1999, Pleo Sirisuwan)

 

4. FORGIVE + FORGET (1999, Teekhadet Vucharadhanin)

 

5. I’M F. (1999, Boonsong Nakphoo)

 

6. SERVICE (1999, Jumpoth Ruayjaroensap)

 

7. WINDOW (1999, Apichatpong Weerasethakul)

 

8.WORLD OF NOPPON โลกของนพพร (1999, นิวัต พุทธประสาท)

 

9. เจ๊ง (1999, Kongdej Jaturanrasamee, Kiat Songsanun)

 

10.สวะ!ดีค่ะ (1999, Kulachat Jitkajornvanich, Luechai Pothisakul)

 

ตอนนั้นเราได้ดู WINDOW ในวันที่ 15 ส.ค. 1999 ในเทศกาลหนังสั้นที่หอภาพยนตร์แห่งชาติ ท่าวาสุกรี และเรายังคงจำความประทับใจในครั้งนั้นได้ไม่รู้ลืม ถึงแม้เวลาจะผ่านมานาน 26 ปีแล้ว

 

เดาว่าในอีก 25 ปีข้างหน้า อาจจะมีคนมาเปิดสูจิบัตรเทศกาลหนังสั้นประจำปี 2024 แล้วก็วี้ดว้ายสุดเสียงกับรายชื่อผู้กำกับที่เคยเข้าชิงรางวัลในปี 2024 เหมือนกันก็ได้นะ 55555

 

 

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

FAVORITE ELEGANTLY BEAUTIFUL, CRUEL AND POWERFUL FEMALE CHARACTERS

 

ประมวลภาพชุด “จิตราภิวัฒน์ และห้องนอนไร้ขอบเขต” JITRAPIWAT AND THE INFINITY BEDROOM

 

สืบเนื่องจากที่เราเคยเขียนไปก่อนหน้านี้ว่า

 

“ปัจจัยหนึ่งที่ทำให้เราชอบหนังเรื่อง SOKAPHIWAT โศกาภิวัฒน์ (2025, Nuttachai Jiraanont, A+30) อย่างสุดขีดก็คือว่า เหมือนหนังเรื่องนี้มันตอบสนองความกะเทยในตัวเราอย่างมาก ๆ คือดูแล้วรู้สึกว่า ถ้าหากตัวเองยังคงเป็นเด็กมัธยม ตัวเองคงต้องขอให้เพื่อนตัดชุดเลียนแบบคลาวเดีย แล้วก็เอาชุดนั้นมาใส่เดินกรุยกรายไปตามทางเดินในโรงเรียน พร้อมกับทำท่าทำทางเลียนแบบคลาวเดียไปเรื่อย ๆ คือดูหนังเรื่องนี้แล้วรู้สึกอยาก role play บทคลาวเดียอย่างรุนแรงมาก ”

 

เราก็เลยจะมาอธิบายเพิ่มเติมว่า ตัวเราเองในปัจจุบันนี้คงไม่กล้า role play อะไรแบบนี้แล้วนะคะ 55555 คืออยากทำมาก ๆ ค่ะ แต่คงไม่กล้าทำ เพราะว่า “สังขารเป็นสิ่งไม่เที่ยง” ค่ะ คือตัวเราในปัจจุบันนี้เป็น “ลุงอ้วนพุงพลุ้ยไว้หนวด” ไปแล้ว เอวจากที่เคย 33 นิ้วเมื่อ 30 ปีก่อน มาปัจจุบันนี้ก็เป็น 37-38 นิ้วไปแล้ว ก็เลยไม่กล้า role play อะไรแบบนี้แล้วค่า 55555

 

แต่พอเราย้อนไปดูภาพถ่ายของตัวเองในอดีตเมื่อ 30-35 ปีก่อน แล้วก็เข้าใจมาก ๆ เลยนะว่า ทำไมเราถึงอยาก role play บท “คุณหญิงโศกาภิวัฒน์” (คลาวเดีย จักรพันธุ์) อย่างรุนแรงมาก เพราะว่าบทนี้เป็นบทของตัวละครหญิงที่ “สวยสง่า เย็นชา อำมหิต อิทธิฤทธิ์สูง” น่ะ และเรามักจะชอบตัวละครแบบนี้ (วันไหนที่เราว่าง ๆ เราค่อยทำลิสท์ตัวละครที่เราชื่นชอบกลุ่มนี้ออกมานะคะ) และเราชอบโพสท่าทางให้ออกมาในทำนองนี้ เมื่อราว 30-35 ปีก่อน ซึ่งจะแตกต่างจากเพื่อน ๆ กะเทยในกลุ่มเดียวกัน เพราะว่าเพื่อนกะเทยบางคนก็ชอบโพสท่าเป็น “สาวเซ็กซี่” บางคนก็ชอบโพสท่าเป็น “กุลสตรี” บางคนก็ชอบโพสท่าเป็น “สาวใส ๆ น่ารัก ๆ” แต่ดิฉันอยากเป็น “สาวสวยสง่า เย็นชา อำมหิต อิทธิฤทธิ์สูง” มาตั้งแต่เมื่อ 30-35 ปีก่อนค่ะ

 

คือถ้าหากดิฉันกับเพื่อน ๆ อายุน้อยกว่านี้ราว 30 ปี แล้วได้ดู “โศกาภิวัฒน์” ด้วยกัน รับรองว่า “สนั่น” แน่ ๆ ค่ะ ดูหนังเสร็จแล้วต้องมีการถ่ายแบบ role play กันแทบไม่ทันแน่นอน 55555

 

เนื่องจากดิฉันในปัจจุบันนี้ไม่กล้า role play อะไรแบบนี้แล้ว ก็เลยขอชดเชยด้วยการขุดกรุภาพถ่ายของตัวเองในทำนองนี้เมื่อ 30-35 ปีก่อนออกมาให้ดูแทนก็แล้วกันนะคะ พร้อมกับนิทานประกอบภาพ

 

JITRAPIWAT AND THE INFINITY BEDROOM

จิตราภิวัฒน์และห้องนอนไร้ขอบเขต

 

(ดัดแปลงมาจากภาพยนตร์เรื่อง “โศกาภิวัฒน์” เพื่อความฮา ๆ หวังว่าคงไม่ว่าอะไรนะคะ)

 

เคาน์เตส จิตราภิวัฒน์ (จิตร โพธิ์แก้ว) ใช้ชีวิตอยู่ในคฤหาสน์หรูหรากลางป่า โดยมีนางข้าทาสชื่อ “แคชฟียา” คอยรับใช้เธอด้วย เธอได้เลี้ยงดูเด็กกำพร้า 8 คนด้วยกันตั้งแต่เด็ก กระทั่งอยู่ในวัยหนุ่ม  8 หนุ่มถูกเลี้ยงมาโดยกฏเหล็กที่เคาน์เตส จิตราภิวัฒน์วางไว้ ซึ่งถ้าหากใครทำผิดกฎ ก็จะต้องถูกลงโทษ ด้วยการบังคับให้ “แก้ผ้า วิดพื้น” โดยมีเคาน์เตส จิตราภิวัฒน์ นอนอยู่บนพื้นด้านล่าง

 

เมื่อทั้ง 8 หนุ่มเติบโตเป็นชายฉกรรจ์เต็มตัว พวกเขาก็เลยคิดกบฏ จะโค่นล้มเคาน์เตส จิตราภิวัฒน์ แล้วพวกเขาก็เลยเผชิญกับคำสาป ร่วงหล่นไปใน “ห้องนอนไร้ขอบเขต” เป็นห้องนอนที่ขยายขนาดและทวีความซับซ้อนมากขึ้นเรื่อย ๆ หาทางออกไม่ได้ จิตราภิวัฒน์กล่าวกับพวกเขาว่า การจะแก้คำสาปนี้ได้ ก็คือ “การร่วมรัก” ดังนั้นพวกเขาทั้ง 8 ควรจะร่วมรักกับจิตราภิวัฒน์ เพื่อจะได้ออกจาก “ห้องนอนไร้ขอบเขต” แห่งนี้ได้

 

ชายฉกรรจ์ทั้ง 8 คน ก็เลยตัดสินใจร่วมรักกันเองอย่างเมามัน เพราะทั้ง 8 คนตกหลุมรักกันเองมานานแล้ว พวกเขาปล่อยให้ จิตราภิวัฒน์ นั่งดูด้วยความอิจฉา แล้วชายฉกรรจ์ทั้ง 8 คนก็หลุดพ้นจากคำสาป ออกจากห้องนอนไร้ขอบเขตนี้ได้ในที่สุด

 

เคาน์เตส จิตราภิวัฒน์ช้ำใจ เธอก็เลยกลับคืนร่างเดิม เป็นแม่หมี ที่แท้เธอเป็นหมีที่มีอายุมานานกว่าพันปีแล้ว ตอนแรกเธอก็เป็นหมีธรรมดา แต่พอเธอได้เป็นเพื่อนกับ “นางพญางูขาว” และพบว่านางพญางูขาวสามารถแปลงร่างเป็นมนุษย์เพศหญิง หาผัวหนุ่มหล่อได้ เธอก็เลยเลียนแบบบ้าง เธอก็เลยบำเพ็ญเพียรมานับพันปี จนแปลงร่างเป็นมนุษย์เพศหญิงได้บ้าง เธอหวังว่าจะได้ผัวหนุ่มหล่อสัก 8 คน แต่ก็ทำไม่สำเร็จ

 

แม่หมีจิตราภิวัฒน์ ปลงตก เธอตั้งใจว่าจะตัดขาดจากกามารมณ์ เธอกลับเข้าสู่ป่า ตั้งใจจะใช้ชีวิตเป็นหมีตามเดิม แต่เธอก็เจอกับ “พระธุดงค์หนุ่มหล่อล่ำนั่งปักกลดอยู่กลางป่า” เธอควรทำเยี่ยงไรดี

 

จบ

https://web.facebook.com/jit.phokaew/posts/pfbid02ua12687kDU78kNYnrBLJsafUySpob9Rf8Szpd53Py7c2mn6c4pTwjCE4xRPNwSp9l

+++++++++

MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND 2012-2013

 

PART 1

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012.html

 

PART 2

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012_22.html

 

PART 3

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-object-from-thailand-2012.html

 

PART 4

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012_25.html

 

PART 5

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012_26.html

++++++

หนังในจินตนาการ: ห้องนอนไร้ขอบเขต

AN IMAGINARY FILM: THE INFINITY BEDROOM

++++++++++

FAVORITE ELEGANTLY BEAUTIFUL, CRUEL AND POWERFUL FEMALE CHARACTERS

ตัวละครหญิงที่ “สวยสง่า, เย็นชา, อำมหิต และอิทธิฤทธิ์สูง” ที่ดิฉันชื่นชอบสุดขีด

 

พอเราได้ดูหนังเรื่อง SOKAPHIWAT โศกาภิวัฒน์ (2025, Nuttachai Jiraanont, A+30) และชื่นชอบตัวละคร “คุณหญิงโศกาภิวัฒน์” (คลาวเดีย จักรพันธุ์) อย่างรุนแรงมาก เราก็เลยคิดว่าเราควรทำลิสท์นี้ดีกว่า เพราะเราชื่นชอบตัวละครทำนองนี้มากเป็นพิเศษ

 

เรียงตามลำดับปีที่ออกฉาย

 

1.Kriemhild (Margarete Schön) from DIE NIBELUNGEN (1924, Fritz Lang, Germany)

 

2.Countess Elizabeth Bathory (Delphine Seyrig) from DAUGHTERS OF DARKNESS (1971, Harry Kümel, Belgium)

 

3.เทวีเซลเค็ต (รัชนู บุญชูดวง) from กฤตยา (1989, วรยุทธ พิชัยศรทัต, tv series)

 

4.เยี่ยนอิ๋งอิ๋ง (จางหมิ่น หรือ Sharla Cheung) from SWORDSMAN เดชคัมภีร์เทวดา (1990, Ching Siu-tung, King Hu, Raymond Lee, Hong Kong)

 

อันนี้เป็น “นางเอก” นะ คือเธออยู่ฝ่ายดี แต่เธอก็ “สวยสง่า อำมหิต อิทธิฤทธิ์สูง” เช่นกัน เราก็เลยรวมเข้ามาไว้ในลิสท์นี้ด้วย

 

5. Isabella (Tilda Swinton) from EDWARD II (1991, Derek Jarman, UK)

 

6. เจ้านางอนัญทิพย์ (ชไมพร จตุรภุช) from เพลิงพระนาง (1996, อดุลย์ บุญบุตร, tv series)

 

7. Madame Marquise de Maintenon (Isabelle Huppert) from SAINT-CYR (2000, Patricia Mazuy, France)

 

8. คุณหญิงเมฆเด็ด (Fiona Tarini Graham) from SHAKESPEARE MUST DIE (2012, Ing K.)

 

9. Lady Tian (Zhou Yun) from THE ASSASSIN (2015, Hou Hsiao-hsien, Taiwan)

 

10. Reverend Mother Mohiam (Charlotte Rampling) in DUNE: PART ONE (2021, Denis Villeneuve)

 

11. “คุณหญิงโศกาภิวัฒน์” (คลาวเดีย จักรพันธุ์) ใน SOKAPHIWAT โศกาภิวัฒน์ (2025, Nuttachai Jiraanont, A+30)

 

ใครอยากแนะนำตัวละครตัวไหนอีกก็บอกมาได้นะคะ

 

เราเขียนถึง SOKAPHIWAT ไว้ที่

https://web.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10240056353169981&set=a.10238091981541918

 

เมื่อ 30-35 ปีก่อนเราชอบ cosplay เป็น “หญิงสวยสง่า เย็นชา อำมหิต อิทธิฤทธิ์สูง” 55555

https://web.facebook.com/jit.phokaew/posts/pfbid02ua12687kDU78kNYnrBLJsafUySpob9Rf8Szpd53Py7c2mn6c4pTwjCE4xRPNwSp9l

+++++++

 

 

ลำดับเหตุการณ์ช่วงกลางเรื่อง SOKAPHIWAT เท่าที่พอนึกออก

 

1. ป้าแม่บ้านถูกผีร้ายสิง เอาเลื่อยไฟฟ้ามาใช้เป็นอาวุธ แล้วก็ถูกฆ่าตาย, แล้วผีร้ายก็เลยหันมาสิงจิตรกรหนุ่มแขนขาด จิตรกรหนุ่มก็เลยจะฆ่าพี่คนรอง (ฤทธิ์เดช) แต่คนอื่น ๆ มาช่วยได้ทัน ตัวจิตรกรหนุ่มก็ถูกฆ่าตายไป

 

2. พระเอก (น้องคนสุดท้อง) ตั้งข้อสังเกตว่า บ้านหลังนี้ไม่มีกระจก ยกเว้นในห้องอะไรสักห้องนึง ถ้าไปส่องกระจก ก็จะรู้ได้ว่าผีร้ายกำลังสิงคนไหนอยู่ ทุกคนก็เลยไปที่ห้องนั้น แล้วก็พบว่าผีร้ายสิงฤทธิ์เดชอยู่ ฤทธิ์เดชยิงวายุศักดิ์ตาย แล้วก็สั่งให้พระเอกถอดสร้อยคอออก แล้วหลังจากนั้นทุกคนก็ช่วยกันฆ่าฤทธิ์เดชจนตายมั้ง

 

3. ทิวา (สาวก๋ากั่น) โผล่เข้ามาในบ้าน เธอเล่าความจริงว่า สำหรับคนธรรมดา (ที่ไม่ใช่คลาวเดีย) บ้านนี้จะเข้าออกได้เฉพาะคืนที่เกิด blood moon และเธอก็เคยพบกับหนุ่ม ๆ กลุ่มนี้มาแล้วเมื่อหลายปีก่อน ซึ่งก็คือฉากช่วงต้นเรื่องที่เด็กหญิง 8 คนขึ้นรถโรงเรียนไป และสวนกับเด็กชาย 7 คนที่ลงจากรถโรงเรียนในคืน blood moon

 

เธอกลับมาบ้านหลังนี้อีกครั้ง เพื่อล้างแค้นปีศาจที่เคยฆ่าเพื่อน ๆ ของเธอเมื่อหลายปีก่อน

 

ทิวาพาหนุ่ม ๆ หลายคนลงไปสำรวจห้องใต้ดิน ซึ่งเป็นห้องที่หนุ่ม ๆ ไม่เคยสำรวจมาก่อน เหลือไว้แค่พระเอกกับหนุ่มใบ้ที่อยู่กันหน้ากระจก

 

4. พระเอกเผลอถอดจิตย้อนกลับไปในอดีต แล้วก็รับรู้ความจริงในอดีตว่า คฤหาสน์หลังนี้คลาวเดียเคยอยู่กับสามีหนุ่มหล่อ สามีคลาวเดียประกาศให้ทุกคนในงานเลี้ยงในคฤหาสน์รับรู้ว่า เขากับคลาวเดียแต่งงานมานาน แต่ไม่มีลูกด้วยกัน เขาก็เลยตัดสินใจรับบุตรบุญธรรมอะไรทำนองนี้ แล้วก็พาเด็กชาย 4 คนกับเด็กหญิง 4 คนเข้ามาในงาน

 

คลาวเดียพาลูกชายของตัวเองที่เป็นอสูรกายเดินเข้ามาในงานเลี้ยง แล้วก็ประกาศความจริงว่า ที่จริงแล้วคลาวเดียกับสามีมีลูกชายด้วยกัน แต่พอลูกชายออกมาเป็นอสูรกายหน้าตาน่าเกลียดน่ากลัว สามีก็เลยไม่กล้าเปิดเผยเรื่องนี้ แต่คลาวเดียจะไม่ปิดบังความจริงเรื่องนี้อีกต่อไป

 

สามีคลาวเดียกับคลาวเดียก็เลยด่าทอกันกลางงานเลี้ยงอย่างรุนแรง ตัวลูกชายคลาวเดียกับสามีคลาวเดียก็เลยต่อสู้กันอย่างรุนแรง จนฆ่ากันตายไปทั้งคู่ คลาวเดียเสียใจมาก

 

5. การที่พระเอกถอดจิต ทำให้ผีร้าย (อสูรกายที่ตายไปแล้วที่เป็นลูกชายคลาวเดีย) เข้าสิงพระเอกได้ พระเอกก็เลยฆ่าหนุ่มใบ้ตาย ถ้าจำไม่ผิด

 

ทิวากับพวกได้ยินเสียงอีกทึก ก็เลยออกมาจากห้องใต้ดิน แล้วก็เอาสร้อยมาสวมให้พระเอกเพื่อไล่ผีร้ายออกจากร่างพระเอก ถ้าจำไม่ผิด

 

6. เหมือนเรื่องจะเฉลยไปเรื่อย ๆ จนเราจับความได้ว่า หลังจากอสูรกายที่เป็นลูกชายคลาวเดียตายไป บ้านนี้เลยต้องคำสาปอะไรสักอย่างมั้ง เข้าออกได้เฉพาะคืน blood moon อสูรกายเป็นโรคจิต ชอบทำร้ายคนที่ละเมิดกฎต่าง ๆ

 

คลาวเดียรับบุตรบุญธรรมกลุ่มที่ 2 เป็นเด็กหญิงราว 8 คน แล้วหลังจากนั้นก็ส่งเด็กหญิงกลุ่มนี้กลับออกไปตอนที่เกิด blood moon ขณะที่รับเด็กกำพร้าผู้ชายเข้ามาใหม่ 7 คนในคืนเดียวกัน

 

คลาวเดียบอกเด็กหญิง 8 คนนั้นขณะขึ้นรถโรงเรียนว่า “ห้ามเปิดหน้าต่างหรือประตูรถเป็นอันขาดระหว่างเดินทาง”

 

แต่ทิวาในวัยเด็ก นั่ง ๆ อยู่บนรถแล้วบอกว่า “พระจันทร์ blood moon สวยจังเลย” แล้วเธอก็เปิดหน้าต่าง ถึงแม้เพื่อน ๆ ห้ามเธอแล้วว่ามันผิดกฎ

 

ปีศาจร้าย (ลูกชายคลาวเดีย) ก็เลยเข้าสิงทิวาในวัยเด็ก แล้วก็ฆ่าเด็กหญิงทุกคนบนรถ ยกเว้นทิวา

 

ทิวาเห็นปีศาจบนรถแล้วก็กลัวมาก เธอลงจากรถโรงเรียน แล้วก็เจอรถยนต์ของพระเอกในวัยเด็กกับแม่อยู่กลางป่า ที่เหมือนกำลังชื่นชมพระจันทร์ blood moon อยู่เหมือนกัน ทิวาก็เลยมาเคาะกระจก เตือนให้พระเอกกับแม่รีบหนีไป แต่ปีศาจร้ายตามมาทัน แล้วก็มาฆ่าแม่พระเอก ส่วนพระเอกในวัยเด็กได้รับการช่วยเหลือโดยคลาวเดีย

 

คลาวเดียจะทำพิธีให้ปีศาจร้ายเข้าสิงร่างพระเอกในวัยเด็ก (เหมือนเธอรับลูกบุญธรรมด้วยสาเหตุนี้ คือต้องการเด็กสักคนเพื่อให้ผีลูกชายเข้าสิง) โดยทำพิธีกลางวงกลม แต่เธอนึกถึงแม่พระเอกก่อนตายที่เหมือนพูดฝากฝังลูกไว้กับเธอ เธอก็เลยทำไม่ลง ไม่ยอมทำพิธีต่อ ปีศาจร้ายก็เลยหันมาสิงร่างคลาวเดียแทน คลาวเดียก็เลยกลายเป็นคนคุ้มดีคุ้มร้ายตั้งแต่นั้นเป็นต้นมา เพราะเธอรักเด็ก ๆ ทุกคน แต่ปีศาจร้ายที่สิงเธอชอบลงโทษเด็ก ๆ ที่ทำผิดกฎ (อาจจะเพราะว่าตอนที่ลูกชายคลาวเดียเป็นคน เขาก็เคยถูกพ่อแท้ ๆ ทำร้ายอย่างรุนแรงมาแล้วเหมือนกัน)

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND 2012-2013

 

MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND 2012-2013

 

PART 1

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012.html

 

PART 2

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012_22.html

 

PART 3

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-object-from-thailand-2012.html

 

PART 4

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012_25.html

 

PART 5

https://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2025/08/mysterious-objects-from-thailand-2012_26.html

 

 

MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND 2012-2013 PART 5

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2013

 

THAI CINEMATIC REVELATIONS IN 2012

 

The article "Mysterious Objects from Thailand" was written in February-April 2012. A year has passed since it was written. So we would like to add some information about other interesting Thai filmmakers who have emerged during the past year.

 

40. Teeranit Siangsanoh

 

Teeranit Siangsanoh made a lot of films before 2012, but 2012 is his year, because 24 new films of his were shown to the public in 2012, and at least six of them are masterpieces: (..........) (2012, 35min), The Burnt-Out Star (2012, 65min), Phenomenon (1) (2012, 29min), Shadow (2012, 27min), Sun Part 2 (2012, 57min), and Unknown (2012, 30min). Many of his films use long static takes like Ruhr (James Benning, 2009), and divide the audience into two camps like James Benning's films: those who extremely love the films and those who extremely hate the films.

 

For Teeranit's devotees, the long static takes in his films are unexplainably powerful and captivating. Night Sky (2012, 15 min) lets us take some long static looks at fluorescent light for 10 minutes while hearing some women gossiping about other people. The Burnt-Out Star shows a woman burning some photos for 22 minutes continuously in a few takes. Unknown shows some blue lights and green lights for 6 minutes, and takes a voyeuristic look at men exercising in a park for 5 minutes. Shadow presents a long static take of a dark sky for 13 minutes. (..........) presents a long static take of the moon for 12 minutes, then a few different takes of the moon for 9 minutes, and then views of Bangkok in the dark for 9 minutes. The last scene of the film shows a nearly complete dark screen for 2 minutes. What we see on the screen is only a tiny spot of the moon. (..........) is undoubtedly one of the most suitable Thai films to be screened together with James Benning's films.

 

Many of Teeranit's films comprise unconnected parts which are joined together poetically. For example, Phenomenon (1) shows us scenes of rain, the moon, a bicycle race on TV, streets with people at night, a spider in a field, reflection of a flickering neon light, the sun, a building under construction, a taking down of a sign in front of a bank, empty streets at night, a room which looks like a jail, a fire burning in the darkness, the strange apparition of a human face in the dark, superimposition of toilet scenes, a woman looking at the camera, a god statue, the blue reflection of TV light on a blanket, the extreme close-up of a TV screen, and the screening room in which the film is shown. We don't know what this film means, and we don't know why these scenes are put together. All we know is that it results in one of the most beautiful Thai films ever made.

 

Many of Teeranit's films have the quality of home movies. All of them were shot by inexpensive cameras, and many of them comprise scenes of ordinary events in ordinary lives. For example, Sun (2012, 57min), Sun Part 2 (2012, 57min), and Sun (Good Morning Sun) (2012, 49 min) present the life of a friend of Teeranit who works as a curtain installer in the south of Thailand. Instead of focusing on interviewing his friend, this trilogy focuses on various ordinary things in his friend's life. In this 163-minute trilogy, what we see include a long gaze on wasteland, a dark swamp, garbage, people playing on a beach, people fishing in a river, daytime streets, nighttime streets, a forest near a pool of water, his friend eating breakfast, his friend eating dinner, his friend searching for a DVD,  daytime market, nighttime market, children playing at night, friends hanging out together, his friend's long drive to work, his friend working at a customer's house, his friend's working at a hospital, tension on the street because of the security issue in the southernmost part of Thailand, customers in a bank, atmosphere in a shop, a wedding, raining, a girl combing her hair, etc. Instead of letting us hear people talk clearly, what this trilogy focuses on seems to be the sound of the wind. By focusing on mundane events, ordinary activities, and everyday life, Teeranit's films somehow end up being ones of the strangest Thai films ever made.

 

In conclusion, we know Teeranit's films are indescribable, like Ruhr, or Zoetrope (Rouzbeh Rashidi, 2011), and what we have described here cannot convey even one percent of the power of his films.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2013

 

41. Ukrit Sa-nguanhai

 

Ukrit has directed at least four short films: Microwave Man (2010, 23min), The Pob's House (2010, 15min), Ghosts in the Classroom (2011, 3min), and Celestial Space (2012, 28min), which is his masterpiece. Celestial Space shows us the romantic relationship of two construction workers from upcountry. There are many interesting things about this film, including the linking between the small space in which this poor couple inhabit and the whole universe, the portrayal of loving laborers in a more down-to-earth style than in such films as Blissfully Yours (Apichatpong Weerasethakul, 2002), and the self-reflexivity.

 

Celestial Space begins with a scene telling us some information about a faraway star. Then it shows us Rug and Noi, two construction workers who reside near a construction site. They try to make love, but Rug gives up after a while. He can't perform the sexual act because of some problems, and the viewers are not sure why. Then we see Noi taking a bath under the moonlight. We see her peeing and washing her vagina. We see them quarrelling about who stole the money from a cookie box, and about who may cheat on his/her lover. We see them kissing each other and trying to pose for some photos. Then we see them fondling each other and making love, before the camera zooms out from their bed and makes the light emanating from their room look like the light from some twinkling stars in the sky.

 

The words "we see" in the paragraph above are important, because the act of seeing is emphasized in Celestial Space. At first the film doesn't tell us if it is a documentary or a fiction. We see Rug and Noi talking very naturally to each other. Their conversation looks very real at first. Then we see them trying to make love, so we can assume then that what we see must be a fiction. Then the film becomes self-reflexive when Noi says to Rug that no one is watching them making love. But we are watching them making love. The viewers start to feel unsure about many things: Are we the reason why they can't make love? Are we a part of the universe or the story in this film? How does the film regard us--viewers, voyeurs, or obtrusive voyeurs?

 

While many things in Celestial Space look so real, the film also shows us many things which emphasize its fictional quality. In one startling scene, we see an eye peering out of a hole in the wall. What does this eye stand for? Us the viewers? We see Rug and Noi trying to pose for some photos. This scene may represent the making of this film, because both this scene and the film are artificial making of an intimate relationship. In the middle of this film, we also see what looks like a draft script of the film, because suddenly the film shows us a piece of paper on which the dialogue of Rug and Noi is written. The intervention of the script text in this film can be compared to the presence of scripts in other great Thai films such as Danger (Director's Cut) (Chulayarnnon Siriphol, 2008) and Politically Lawyer and Narrative Cinema (Chaloemkiat Saeyong, 2009).

 

In the middle of Celestial Space, we also see one of the best scenes in Thai cinema in 2012. In this scene, Noi is looking for Rug in a building under construction. The scene is as blurred as some scenes in A Lake (Philippe Grandrieux, 2008). We see Noi and hear her voice calling out for Rug. We hear Rug's response from the right side of the frame. Noi moves into the darkness. Then the camera pans to the left side and we see Rug in another room searching for Noi. What is real? The film seems to tell us indirectly many times that though the lives of laborers in this film look realistic, the film does not and cannot show the whole reality. A part of reality exists outside the frame or outside the film. What we see is only a part of something and we must also use our own imagination. Celestial Space is great because it shows laborers' lives very realistically and acknowledges at the same time that reality also exists outside the frame and the film.

 

That great scene in Celestial Space can be compared to another marvelous scene in The Pob's House, in which fiction turns into reality in the middle of the film. At first The Pob's House shows us a fictional story of an old woman and her granddaughter in a rural village. The old woman is wrongly accused of being a Pob, or a cannibalistic ghost. The villagers beat her young granddaughter very hard, and force the old woman to drink her own urine to prove if she is Pob or not. Suddenly a young boy in this torture scene turns back and looks at the camera. He seems to smile, and it indicates that he is just an amateur actor who can't act convincingly as a misguided villager in this film. The image of this boy freezes. The screen turns black. Then The Pob's House continues, but the story is shifted from fiction into reality. The second part of The Pob's House shows the working of the film crew. The film crew also talk to the villagers who act in this film, asking the villagers if they understand or not that the fictional story in this film is meant to show "structural violence."

 

Structural violence is also the theme of Ghosts in the Classroom. In Ghosts in the Classroom, we see an old female teacher punishing severely or using force on a young male student in front of the class. The scene is repeated 4-5 times but with different angles or perspectives each time. Sometimes we see only the front of the class. Sometimes we see this act of violence from the back of the class. We also see that the other students in the class seem to be very obedient and dare not try to intervene in this act of violence. Another remarkable thing in Ghosts in the Classroom is that the film seems to have no beginning and no ending. The film begins and ends with the same image. It's a half-still, half-shaking image of this act of violence. This act of violence seems like a loop which will be repeated forever.

 

There is no indication what Ghosts in the Classroom stands for. Does this film intend to condemn only Thai people's belief in seniority like another great Thai film My Elephant (Songyos Sugmakanan, 2002, 10min)? Or does this film have some political connotations, like other Thai films, such as Demockrazy (Duangporn Pakavirojkul, 2007, 9min), and Class Room (Sutee Kunavichayanont, 2012, video installation), both of which also use classroom as a symbol of Thailand after the coup in 2006? It's up to each viewer to answer this question by himself.

 

Some viewers may ask, "Who will be the next Apichatpong?" To that question we would like to answer, "We don't know. But if you like Apichatpong's films, we strongly recommend the films of Eakalak Maleetipawan, Sittiporn Racha, and Ukrit Sa-nguanhai. And we hope some critics will compare, contrast, and analyze deeply the films of these four filmmakers in the future."

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2013

 

42. Viriyaporn Boonprasert

 

No one knows for sure who Viriyaporn Boonprasert is. Seven films of Viriyaporn were shown to the public in 2012. Three of them are masterpieces: Ghost of Centralworld (2012, 8min), I'm Gonna Be a Naive (2012, 24min), and Hungary Man Boo (2012, 26min). But Viriyaporn still hasn't revealed herself to the public yet. Viriyaporn has a facebook account, but it doesn't show the real face of Viriyaporn. Many Thai cinephiles are not sure if Viriyaporn is a man, a woman, or a group of filmmakers working under a single name. Thus, we are not sure which pronoun we should use for Viriyaporn: he, she, or they. But for the writer's convenience, the pronoun "she" and "her" will be referred to Viriyaporn here.

 

What is certain is that Viriyaporn is one of the most talented filmmakers working in Thailand now. Most of her films rely on found footage, and her use of found footage is as powerful and clever as The Autobiography of Nicolae Ceausescu (Andrei Ujica, 2010), Dial H-I-S-T-O-R-Y (Johan Grimonprez, 1997), Disorder (Huang Weikai, 2009), An Escalator in World Order (Kim Kyung-man, 2011), The Festival of Demon Spirit (Sittiporn Racha, 2011), and Videogram of a Revolution (Harun Farocki, Andrei Ujica, 1992). Ghost of Centralworld uses clips showing the Centralworld department store while it was burnt down during the massacre in Bangkok in May 2010, and also a clip of an opening event at Centralworld. Some texts appear on the screen, telling the true story of Kitipong Somsook, a red-shirt protester who was killed during the fire at Centralworld. However, the main message of this film may not lie in the texts and the clips, but it may lie in the juxtaposition of the clips.

 

I'm Gonna Be a Naive uses found footage from various sources, including a TV reality show, TV talk shows, TV advertisements, an awarding ceremony, a TV series, a news clip, a news photo, a music video, a karaoke music video, etc. There are no new voiceover, no new texts, and no new images in this film. All of this film is made of found footage, but the film can talk about some  important topics in Thailand very effectively. The various topics in this film include how Thai bourgeois people wrongly perceive poor people, how selfish Bangkokians are, the drastically changing status of Chinese people in Thailand from the past to the present, how propaganda-like Thai advertisements are, the behaviors of some Thai conservatives, etc. The juxtaposition of the clips in this film is brilliant. The selection of the clips is great. Many advertisements shown in this film are the advertisements which we have seen a thousand times before, but they yield some new meanings when they are presented in this film. In a way, what Viriyaporn did for this film corresponds to what Thomas Heise said in the booklet for his DVD of the film Material (2009). Thomas Heise said, " In a dictatorship, the idea is to amass hidden stores of images and words, portraying the things that people living under the dictatorship might have actually experienced, but that could not necessarily be seen or heard. Then, when the dictatorship was no more, those images bore witness to it. Similar to the mole, the work of collecting those images required a certain nose for the worthwhile as well as practice, since a picture seldom makes it immediately apparent what it depicts and a sound seldom tells us of the part we can't hear."

 

Hungary Man Boo, which has its premiere in December 2012,  uses both found footage and new footage. The film is more abstract and more difficult to understand than the first six films of Viriyaporn, but it is no less powerful. Hungary Man Boo comprises many different parts, the links of which are not clear. Its structure is like some films by Alexander Kluge. What we can see in this film includes a quote from Mughom Wongtes, a Thai female writer who bravely fights for free speech, some buildings at Sanam Luang, a clip of three women performing Thai traditional dance, a clip of Chaipattana aerator, new experimental footage presenting the suffering of poor people who have to take public bus in Bangkok, and a scene showing white screen and dark screen alternately for a long time like in the film Arnulf Rainer (Peter Kubelka, 1960). Hungary Man Boo does not say anything directly, and it may be because Thailand is a country which is totally against free speech.

 

Other films of Viriyaporn are interesting, too. The Opening Scene (2012, 11min) comprises a long static scene showing the screening room in which the film is shown. Viriyaporn stated that this film is meant to be a site-specific video installation. This film is like a mirror, which reflects different periods of time in the same location. The Opening Scene is also dedicated to Édouard Manet's painting A Bar at the Folies-Bergère (1882) and many artists in Postmodernism who use mirrors in their works. In our opinion, The Opening Scene can also be compared to Phenomenon (1) (Teeranit Siangsanoh, 2012, 29min) and Resistant Poem (Prap Boonpan, 2008, 20min), both of which also depict the screening room in which the films were shown.

 

Sarcastic humor is inherent in Viriyaporn's films. We can see this sarcasm in the juxtaposition of some scenes in I'm Gonna Be a Naive and Hungary Man Boo, and this sarcasm is the main thing in Seeing Film and Love Country (2012, 3 min). This film shows an online conversation between two persons, talking about how to be patriotic. The answer given in the film is that you can be patriotic by illegal downloading some Thai patriotic films, such as the film series Naresuan.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2013

 

43. Vorakorn Ruetaivanichkul (born 1989)

 

Vorakorn directed Mother (2012, 65min), which mixes documentary and fiction in an interesting way. The film begins as a documentary, showing Vorakorn returning home, meeting his own family, including his mother who looks normal and kind. After that, the film enters a fictional world by showing us some reconstructed scenes from Vorakorn's past, using an actor to play Vorakorn, and a veteran stage actress to play his mother who actually has severe physical and mental problems. Then the film goes deeper into the fictional world by showing us some surrealistic scenes to properly portray the inner world of his mother, and sometimes to disrupt the linear timeline of the story.

 

The blending between fiction and documentary in Mother yields a stunning result. Mother is as touching and hurtful as Tarnation (Jonathan Caouette, 2003), which also deals with a director and his problematic mother. Vorakorn is not as lucky as Caouette in the way that Vorakorn hasn't shot a lot of home movies in the past, so he does not have old documentary footage which can be used in this film. However, he cleverly solved this problem by shooting some reconstructed scenes and doesn't try to limit this film to be only "realistic", but gives priorities to the emotions and the poetic aspect of the film. The resulting film is quite heartbreaking and brave, and it stands apart from many Thai films which depict the directors' own mothers only in a good light.

 

After Mother, which is his thesis film, Vorakorn directed two good documentaries: The Director of Southpole (2012, 18min) and Neighborly Labor (2012, 26min). The Director of Southpole frankly captures a drunken moment of his three friends. Neighborly Labor gives us an interview of two servants from Myanmar who work for a Thai family in Bangkok. It is an episode in a great TV documentary series called K(l)ang Muang .Both films by Vorakorn are interesting because they make the viewers feel very intimate with the subjects of the films. The viewers feel as if they are close friends of the subjects of The Director of Southpole, and feel as if they just get to know new friends from Myanmar in Neighborly Labor. We can also say that both these films and Mother are very humanistic. They present human beings through a kind, loving, and truthful eye.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2013

 

44. Wichanon Somumjarn

 

Wichanon's first film is W.C. (2005, 8min), which is about a ghost in a toilet. At first glance W.C. seems to be similar to numerous Thai short films telling the same kind of stories. But there is something existential and unexplainable in the story of W.C., and these qualities help set it apart from other ghost-in-toilet Thai films which aim to be only horrors,  comedies, or horror-comedies. Wichanon said that W.C. is partly inspired by Fight Club (David Fincher, 1999). That may help explain why W.C. is more intriguing than other films in this Thai sub-genre, though the best film in this sub-genre is still Hallucination (Sopon Sakdapisit, 2002, 16min).

 

After that, Wichanon directed The Hitman (2007, 20min), which is a gangster film about two hitmen and a crime boss who deceive one another. He also directed A Brighter Day (2007, 17min), which is a political film condemning both corrupted politicians and military dictators. Both The Hitman and A Brighter Day are just average narrative films. However, it is interesting to compare A Brighter Day with Wichanon's later film L L P (2011, 2min) in order to see how Wichanon's filmic style has evolved. A Brighter Day sends its message about the director's hope for democracy directly, while L L P sends its message about liberty and freedom in a subtler way. L L P is composed of only three shots. The first shot shows three guys wearing Che Guevara T-shirts playing takraw together. The second shot shows a glimpse of sunrise, and the third shot shows the painting Liberty Leading the People (1830) by Eugène Delacroix. We don't know if Wichanon's political thinking has changed from the past or not, but his filmic style seems to have evolved a lot.

 

The first great film of Wichanon is Four Boys, White Whiskey and Grilled Mouse (2009, 10min). It shows that Wichanon's filmic style has changed from the style of genre films (W.C., The Hitman) to the contemplative style which can be found in many arthouse films from Southeast Asia. Four Boys, White Whiskey and Grilled Mouse presents a small moment in the lives of four rural boys. These four boys eat a grilled mouse, drink white whiskey, and talk about various things, such as a plan to have sex with a girl, a god in a banknote, etc., in a little shack in the rice field in the afternoon. They leave the shack one by one, until the protagonist is left alone. Then the protagonist watches TV news in his house alone later in the evening. The film is quite poignant, and seems to "tangentially" touch on political topics. This latter quality can also be found in Wichanon's later films--L L P and In April the Following Year, There Was a Fire (2012, 76min). These three films don't talk about politics directly, but present lives of ordinary people who are indirectly affected by politics--the boy who watches TV in Four Boys, the guys who wear Che Guevara T-shirts in L L P, and the guy who listens to radio/TV news about the crackdown of a political mob in Bangkok in In April the Following Year.

 

In April the Following Year and Four Boys have a few things in common. Apart from the intriguing use of radio/TV news in both films, both films are also partly inspired by Wichanon's real life, and both films present rural lifestyles very truthfully. Local dialects, which are rarely found in films made by other directors, are used in both films. And both films share the contemplative style. Both films don't tell stories full of exciting events or conflicts, but they present slices of ordinary life. Both films present lives of people while they are drifting around a little bit aimlessly. The characters in both films don't like to overtly express their emotions. They seem to feel something, but they hold most of their emotions and feelings inside.

 

What is interesting about In April is that the film tells two stories at the same time. One is about Nuhm, a guy who loses a job in Bangkok. He decides to return to his homeland in the north-east of Thailand. He meets Joy, a woman he likes. He drinks with friends. He looks after a horse stable of his estranged father.

 

Then, in a way which may remind one of Our Beloved Month of August (Miguel Gomes, 2008), In April also presents its documentary part. We learn from the film that Aun (the nickname of Wichanon) returns home in April, talking to his dad about Aun's resigning from an engineering school in order to make films, talking to his brother about his brother's being attacked by a jellyfish many years ago, reminiscing about the fire which destroyed his house and which made him move to Bangkok many years ago, looking at his father's stable, and making a film about a guy who returns home.

 

The blending between fiction and documentary in In April is very interesting. Nuhm in the fictional part is not only the representation of Aun, but also of other people in Aun's life. Though Nuhm returns home and does many things like Aun, Nuhm was also attacked by a jellyfish like Aun's brother. Aun seems to transfer the memories of his own brother into his own memory and then transfers it to Nuhm, a character whom he created. Life and film blend into each other. The fictional film in In April is not a straight autobiography, but it is something new made from Aun's life and many other things.

 

The presentation of rural people in In April is also very interesting. Nuhm in this film is not a poor, uneducated laborer like rural characters in most Thai films. He is a guy who can't fit in both his homeland and Bangkok. Both he and Joy are alienated characters. Nuhm used to work as a foreman in Bangkok, but he wants to make films, and he seems to return home just because he has no other better choices. All he can do in his homeland is carrying a tripod around. Joy is a woman who likes to read Albert Camus' books, talks philosophically, and sings some modern songs, but she has to sing karaoke of some country songs with her colleagues in order to fit in with her society.

 

The characters in both Four Boys and In April give some poignant, melancholic feelings. Their lives are far from being a tragedy. Their lives are ordinary. They are not real losers. But there are some kinds of disappointment and loneliness in their lives which make their stories very touching. Apart from the boy who is left alone at the shack in Four Boys, Nuhm, and Joy, another character who belongs to this group is Aun's brother in In April. After Aun's brother was attacked by the jellyfish, his father tried to heal him by rubbing his wound with beach morning glory. But the sand which came with the plant made thing worse. It turned the wound into a scar. And this scar prevented Aun's brother from entering a cadet school. Aun's brother can't fulfill his dream because of his own father's mistake.

 

In April ends with some intriguing scenes. It ends like a documentary, showing people walking in Ratchaprasong area and other areas which used to be the scene of bloodshed in April-May 2010. This ending fits the film very well, because this film does not talk about political activists, but about ordinary people who unknowingly and unavoidably become a part of political structure or political system.

-----

Apart from the five directors above, other interesting Thai filmmakers in 2012 include Abhichon Rattanabhayon, Ajon Srivadhana Kibreab, Banyong Phoonsap, Fari Tesprateep, Kongdej Jaturanrasamee, Kong Pahurak,  Manasak Khlongchainan, Monthon Arayangkoon, Pitchayakorn Sangsuk, Sarayut Vannagool, Setthasiri Chanjaradpong, Siwapond Cheejedreiw, Somghad Meyen, Soraya Nakasuwan, Suphisara Kittikunarak, Teeraponk Panyakam, Theeraphat Ngathong, Tongpong Chantarangkul, Warit Deepisuti, and Wassachol Sirichanthanun.  Let's hope all of them will continue making films in the future.

 

Monday, August 25, 2025

MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND 2012-2013 PART 4

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

31.Tulapop Saenjaroen (born 1986)

 

Tulapop is an upcoming and interesting filmmaker-artist. He started making short films when he was in high school and had an interest in alternative films around the world. His earliest works are always narrative and are about relationships between people in the family, for example, To Vanish (2005, 19 min), and Sad Scenery (2005, 19 min), which got Vichitmatra award from the 9th Thai Short Film and Video Festival. Later, he had a chance to study fine art at The School of the Art institute of Chicago. His works became more artistic, for example, Our Waves (2006, 12 min), "___" (2006, 8 min), which is informally called The Underscore Film, and 2008 (2008, 3 min). 2008 is one of the short films in the Project 2008 by Third Class Citizen who invited about 30 Thai filmmakers to make 30 short films about the coming year 2008. In this short film, 2008, Tulapop made an end credit roll up from bottom to top of the frame. He put roles of actors in the end credit, for example, good person as good person, bad person as good person, bad person as bad person, etc. It's a smart satirical idea to relate cinematic world and real world with this simple method. Though his works became more artistic, some of them are still narrative, for example, Tale of swimming pool (2008, 13 min), The Return (2008, 5 min), and After the Wind (2009, 19 min). In The Return, Tulapop tries to imitate the voice of his father who passed away when he was young, and he does this to fulfill his lost memory about his father. Some of his works try to play with viewer's perception, for example, Distinction (2011, 23 min), which experiments with the format of an interview. The piece focuses on the relationship between a maid and her female employer. The performers are asked to perform both roles, as themselves and as the other. Distinction got Vichitmatra award and R.D. Pestonji's Special Mention Award from the 15th Thai Short Film and Video Festival. Now he's studying fine art media at Slade School of Fine Art in London.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

32.Uruphong Raksasad

 

Uruphong is the master of Thai pastoral cinema. Because of his family background and his poetic eyes, he can capture the essence, the feelings, the landscape, and the rhythm of life of northern Thai farmers better than most filmmakers. He made March of Time 1 (2000, 19 min) and

March of Time 2 (2000, 21 min) while he was studying in a university in Bangkok. These two films stood out from most Thai students' films at that time because of their extreme slowness and their total immersion in rural atmosphere. Uruphong made a few short films about farmers' daily life again in 2005, including The Bicycle Song (2005, 16 min), which is about old people's bicycling activities; Day and Night (2005, 11 min), which is about how rural children spend the night together; The Longest Day (2005, 14 min), which is a heartbreaking portrait of old people who are left alone in the country while their children go to work in Bangkok; The Musician (2005, 12 min), which is about the split personalities of a rural musician at night; and The Way (2005, 8 min), which shows a man and a kid walking through tall grass or something like that. The Way is a very stunning film because it can make the viewers feel as if they are walking in the film themselves. The viewers can feel as if their faces and bodies are touched or pierced by the blades of the grass. This film is a good example of Uruphong's films, because it shows how great he is in capturing the rural atmosphere. Later, Uruphong made a feature film called Stories from the North (2006, 88 min) by combining these short films together.

 

Uruphong's masterpiece is Agrarian Utopia (2009, 122 min), which is half-documentary, half-fiction. In making this film, Uruphong had some farmers grow rice in a farm while he recorded their lives, daily activities, and problems. The cinematography in this film is breathtaking, and the film helps making the viewers, especially Bangkokians, aware of the serious problems that rice growers have to face, such as the land ownership problems, the debts, and the exploitations by the capitalists.

 

Though Uruphong's famous films, such as The Rocket (2006, 18:30 min) and Dad's Picture (2010, 8 min)(20), are about farmers, he has also made other kinds of films, for example, The Planet (2007, 7:30 min), which is an animation about nature conservation, and To (2010, 16 min), which is an interesting documentary about his urban friend's life.

 

There are many great Thai films about villagers' lives, such as Tongpan

(Euthana Mukdasanit, Surachai Janthimathorn, Rasamee Paoluengtong, Paijong Laisakul, 1977), Yoke (students of Thammasat University, 1979), Red Bamboo (Permpol Cheyaroon, 1979), Son of Mool River (Surasee Patum, 1980), Son of the North East (1982, Vichit Kounavudhi), and Farmer Field School (Supong Jitmuang, 2007). What makes Uruphong's films different from these films is the extremely atmospheric quality in his films. However, Uruphong is not exactly alone in making Thai atmospheric or contemplative pastoral cinema. Other films in the same vein include Violet Basil (Supamok Silarak, 2004, 80 min), Four Boys, White Whiskey and Grilled Mouse (Wichanon Somumjarn, 2009, 10 min), Harvest Season (Pisut Srimork, 2009, 20 min), Poor People the Great (Boonsong Nakphoo, 2010, 76 min), Kite (Nuntawut Poophasuk, 2011, 8 min), and Lung Neaw Visits His Neighbours (Rirkrit Tiravanija, 2011, 154 min), a film which verges on a parody of Thai contemplative pastoral cinema.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

33.Vichaya Mukdamanee (born 1984)

Vichaya Mukdamanee is known as a mixed media artist. His artwork is always inspired by human lives, their relationships to one another, and to their environments. Most of his works present the essence and feelings that come from the constant change in this modern society. Vichaya is not an independent filmmaker but is an artist who uses video as a medium to show the process of his installation work. In Art-ificial Being, an exhibition at National Art Gallery in 2011, Vichaya uses daily life objects as an inspiration and important components to create his unique artwork. He applies various kinds of techniques including drawing, painting, collage, video, photography, and performance in order to express his creativity and subject matter. In this exhibition, he uses video as a medium to document his performance when he tries to install many types of cheap bed structure. Some types are possible to be installed but some are not, depending on the balance. In Cut-Thru, an exhibition at Institute of Contemporary Art Singapore, he also uses video to document his performance when he and his friends try to install chairs and office tables among a rice field. Another video in the exhibition shows he and his friends trying to install chicken cages and fish traps among modern buildings in the city. He always pays particular attention to the unstable lives of working-class people and the difference of classes in the countryside and the big city.

 

34.Visra Vichit-Vadakan

 

Visra Vichit-Vadakan is part of a new wave of Thai artists who are passionate about their individual art but are also dedicated to shaping a community of young people who teach compassion and encourage social action and social responsibility through their work. Visra has lived between the United States and Thailand her entire life. She graduated from Stanford University with a degree in Human Biology and Education Policy and worked for the Thai government under the Office of Knowledge Management and Development until the coup d'état in 2006. Visra subsequently left Thailand and enrolled at NYU Tisch School of the Arts graduate film program. At Tisch, she received the Reynolds Fellowship in Social Entrepreneurship and the Tisch Graduate Fellowship. She is a granddaughter of Luang Vichit-Vadakan, a progressive playwright and politician, and a bride of Mark Zuckerberg's close friend, one of the founders of Facebook.

Her first short film, Rise (2006, 8 min)(21), was screened at the Thai Short Film and Video Festival in 2006 where it gained the attention of Jit Phokaew, a cinephile, who chose Rise as one of the top Thai short films that year. Rise is about a man who wears all-white clothes, like clothes for doing meditation. He does a performance at Sanam-Luang in front of Grand Palace. He wraps himself by white fabric and rolls on a fabric tainted with  red, white, and blue colors, which are the colors of Thai national flag. Around the performer, there are a lot of people who wear yellow shirts for the King's birthday and may be for a political group called People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD or Panthamit). Moreover, there are voices of Visra's parents talking about how they treated Visra when she was a kid, how they are proud of their daughter, and how they are worried about their daughter when she turns her focus to filmmaking instead of science. Among the voiceovers, the mother says, "I would be disappointed because you have the potential to do so much more than this. I don't want your life to pass by without any accomplishment for society". At the end of the film, the mother says, "I think that you will win a Nobel Prize," then the father says, "Not an Oscar?" to which the mother replies, "A Nobel Prize would be better." Rise can be a personal diary of a filmmaker who has a conflict with her parents. It represents a turning point in her life. On the other hand, the appearance of PAD or yellow shirt people in this film signifies the turning point of Thai politics in 2006, too. So, Rise is not only a personal diary but also a Thai political diary. The film asks whether "the kids" would obey their "parents" or not, and this question can have both personal and political implications.  

After Rise, she made a few shorts, for example, Fall (2008, 4 min)(22), and In Space (2010, 16 min)(23). Her current project is Karma Police. In this film, which takes place in Bangkok in 2013, a Buddhist monk detective solving religious crimes uncovers a government secret involving the Thai Space Agency and their program to send the first Thai citizen into outer space. Karma Police has received the Hubert Bals Fund for Script and Development and participated in The International Film Festival Rotterdam's Cinemart in 2011.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

                                                                            

35.Wachara Kanha (born 1985)

 

Wachara has been making films since 2006, but within a few years he has been making about 40 short films and several feature films. He also helps other directors making films and also plays in others' films. He is one of the most prolific Thai directors now.

 

Wachara has been making films in almost every genre. His works include Black and White (2008, 14 min), which is a drama film; Dad (2007, 10 min), which is a film for children; First Love First Last (2009, 14 min), which is a weird romantic film; The French Classroom and the Mysteries of François (2011, 33 min), which is a political film; The Forgotten (2011, 123 min), which is a documentary; Hunter the Bag (co-directed with Tani Thitiprawat (2009, 17 min), which is a yakuza film; The Judge (2009, 25 min), which is a homoerotic film; The Morning Atmosphere at Home at 6 AM (2011, 16 min), which is a home movie; Pee Pong (2010, 30 min), which is an environmental film; Percepto 01 Sound of Psycho (2011, 21 min), which is a crime film; Pusumra (2009, 22 min), which is a sci-fi film; A Story in a Car (2011, 4 min), which is like a video diary; Take Granny Morn to the Garden (2010, 14 min), which is an essay film; and many experimental films, such as Closer (2010, 18 min), The Dream of Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (2011, 24 min), The First Stage of My New Beginning (2010, 30 min), Lose (2011, 70 min), The Nakorn Asajarn Trilogy (2011, 86 min), Prisoners of Love (2010, 30 min), The Rape of Bangkok (co-directed with Teeranit Siangsanoh, 2011, 90 min), Running (2007, 3 min), and Someday You Will Love Me Like I Love You (2011, 50 min). He also gave memorable performances in horror films by other directors, such as Eye (Tawee Nuipree, Rossukon Suthiwongs, 21 min) and 1by1 (Tanachit Mungkunkumshound, 10 min).

 

Wachara is an ultra-low budget filmmaker. He uses every resource he can find to explore the world of cinema by himself. Though his films lack good production values and smooth editing, his films show us his great effort to understand every kind of cinema. Though he may try to imitate scenes in other films by using his basic tools, his irrepressible enthusiasm ensures that his films are not just cheap imitations of the real things, but are something weird, unique and defying explanation.

 

Wachara's films are not "polished" diamonds, but his films are full of energy which comes from his uncompromising attitude and his untiring efforts to make his dreams come true. He is also a very open person who doesn't try to hide anything in his life. Seeing his films is to know about his body (Filmvirus), his political thoughts, his love stories (Waiting for a Pregnant Love), his frustration with love (To Show the Image of My Love for You), his ambition (My Second Birth), his weakness, his good points, his friends (Our Last Night Together), his family (A Documentary about My Family), his financial status (Garbage Picking), his mistakes, etc. Many viewers may hate his uncompromising films, but they can't deny the unique power of his films.

 

Wachara belongs to a group of filmmakers called The Underground Office, which is one of the most interesting Thai filmmaker groups now. The other two members of the group are Tani Thitiprawat and Teeranit Siangsanoh. They always help each other making each one's films. and they sometimes make great films together and share the director's credit in the films. Their collective efforts include Red Movie (2010, 40 min), which records their anger towards the massacre in Bangkok on May 19, 2010; Fueng (2010, 30 min), which is an extremely poetic home movie presenting these filmmakers' lives and dreams; and A Golf Course (2010, 5 min), which records their anger towards some golf courses which cause so much trouble for Thai villagers.

 

Though these three filmmakers belong to the same group, each of them has a distinct style of his own. Wachara's films are a bit more romantic than the other two. Tani likes to combine many genres of film together like Quentin Tarantino. Tani's works include The Chilling Hours and the Murderer in the Numbing Silence (2010, 30 min), Disappear (2010, 26 min), Me and My Video Diary (2010), and To Walk Night (2009, 25 min). Each of these four films have many genres within itself. Teeranit's films are the gloomiest and the most poetic among the three, and often concern with the apocalypse. His ultra-low budget apocalyptic films, which may be partly inspired by Andrei Tarkovsky and Derek Jarman, include Dark World (2010, 53 min), In the City (2010, 50 min), Last of Thailand (2009, 24 min), and The Light House (2011, 43 min), Teeranit's masterpiece is Dark Sleep (2009, 15 min), which may remind some viewers of the kind of power found in the films of Maya Deren, David Lynch, or Nina Menkes.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

36.Wasunan Hutawach

 

Wasunan has made only a few short films, but these films demonstrate clearly her great ability to capture slices of life. In most of Wasunan's films, we see only several fragments of or several moments in someone's life, but these several moments yield so much power and can represent the character's heart and soul within a few minutes. In Small World (2008, 17 min), Wasunan presents us slices of a woman's life. The heroine of this film lives an ordinary boring life in Bangkok, but deep down inside she misses her idyllic home, and then one day she wakes up and finds out that she magically returns home and can spend some time with her mom again. The film tells this story in a documentary-like way, instead of resorting to sentimentality like other Thai films dealing with the same topic. In Daw (2009, 7 min), Wasunan plays a woman who seems to have some troubles with her boyfriend and her mom. The problems in this woman's life are not spelled out. The viewers must infer about her problems by observing little gestures of the characters and noticing some hints in the dialogue. Wasunan's masterpiece is Let's Eat (2011, 11 min), which presents us two scenes in two sisters' lives. The first scene deals with a dinner of the two sisters with a few friends. The conversation during the dinner seems ordinary, but at the same time it may also hint at some interesting characteristics of the sisters. The second scene is a long silent scene depicting the two sisters while they are driving back home. Silence speaks a thousand words in this scene, and it leaves a really long-lasting impression on the viewers. The power of Let's Eat can be compared to the power of such films as A Week's Holiday (Bertrand Tavernier, 1980), which depicts one undramatic week in the life of an ordinary woman. Everything in Let's Eat and A Week's Holiday seems to come from an ordinary life, but there's something unexplainable but very powerful in both films which makes the films truly extraordinary.

 

Wasunan also deals with little things in life in other films. Hell Factory (2008, 5 min) captures the moment of someone watching Country Hotel (Ratana Pestonji, 1957, 138 min) and getting inspiration from the old film. Love Me Love My Dog (2010, 8 min) portrays her dog, but what is really interesting in the film is the way she portrays herself. This Way (2010, 5 min) deals with ordinary pedestrians' problem with the troop roadblocks during the political unrest in Bangkok in May 2010. The Visitors (2011, 2 min) deals with some people who like to take photographs with big dolls, wax figures, and palace guards. Wasunan also made A Railroad Engineer (2011, 8 min), which is an interesting experimental film. In this film, we hear a voiceover telling a story of a boy, a girl, and a railroad which connects them, but we only see images of an old man, a railroad, and a sunrise.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

37.Weerapong Wimuktalop

 

Weerapong's films have something similar to the films of Phaisit Phanphruksachat, who sometimes works as a producer and editor for Weerapong's films. Both filmmakers create films which give us very limited "information" and inspire the viewers to create stories for the films by themselves. When we see the films by these two filmmakers, we don't understand at first what the story is or what is happening in the films, but we will gradually create some stories inside our heads, not from the information given to us, but because we are not given enough information. Films by Weerapong and Phaisit take us to the new boundary of storytelling.

 

To see Weerapong's films is to observe beauty in small things, in ruins, in poverty, and in the streets of agony. His films are shot by the only one video camera that he has. The resulting pictures are grainy and blurred, but these pictures show us the glow in the gloomy lives of working class people, whom Weerapong likes to observe with the eyes of a peer.

                                                           

In Colours on the Streets (2009, 62 min), Weerapong tells us a story of a man who takes a train to Bangkok to find his father. The film lets us see the world through this character's eyes without any narration or explanation in the first half of the film. The film lets us see many streets in Bangkok through the eyes of a stranger who does not feel excited by the spectacle of a big city, but likes to observe marginal people and urban communities of poor people. The camera takes us to ghettos and places devoid of standard beauty, and lets us stroll in the "underground" of Bangkok. These places in the film are not exactly situated underground, but they are places where the middle class know exist, but never set foot in or even take a look at.

 

In the middle of Colours on the Streets, the camera takes us inside some narrow alleys at night until it reaches a certain man. Then some texts appear on the screen, telling us about a father who bought a camera for his son, knowing that one day his son must walk alone. After the camera watches this man for a while without any greetings, it takes us back to the train station. The train now goes in the opposite direction to the beginning of the film, taking us back home among heavy rain. The routes which we have seen in the beginning now look duskier. The camera takes us to the beginning of a road which leads to the character's home, and lets us observe some unpaved roads with puddles and mud. The camera takes us to watch an old wooden elevated house above a parched ground, a house which seems to stand in a forsaken field. The camera also takes us to watch some fields along a railway. We can see some new luxurious apartment buildings from afar, but we are standing in a forsaken place. Lights fade from the sky. The train has passed, and the character forlornly watches it.

 

 

In Swing (2011, 30 min), the film lets us observe an uncle and a nephew who ride a bicycle to a deserted place near an expressway. The uncle tries to make a swing under a big tree for the nephew to play, but his attempt is fruitless. The swing is unusable. The uncle and nephew still linger at that place. It is the place for garbage dumping and some hovels. The uncle asks the nephew to stay with him until lights at expressway are turned on at night, because the sight of these lights are one of the most beautiful things he can afford to experience. Then they ride home.

 

Is it possible that the aesthetics of experimental cinema can combine with the gazing of working class people? When a working class person becomes an artist, will he abandon the way he used to gaze at his own life and turn to gaze at everything in detachment like an artist? In Weerapong's films, the camera watches via the eyes of a working class person whose living conditions resemble many Thai people's. The images in his films are the images of small flats, old wooden houses, dusty window screens, pools of dirty water, areas under expressways, garbage dump, ruins, and deserted areas. The gazing in his films neither tries to tell a story nor tries to represent anything. It is the same kind of gazing that we use when we watch the sky, trees, things blowing in the wind, and the sunlight.

 

Weerapong's films are his visual diaries. We are the third person who watches things in his films via the eyes of the first person. We cannot understand the things he watches, though we look at them through his eyes. We are only the "guests" in his films. Weerapong doesn't try to explain anything for us. He only lets us look through his eyes. We must try to understand by ourselves.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

38.Weerasak Suyala

Weerasak has been making films since 2002, but his first cult hit is The Police (2008, 15 min), which is about a pair of identical twins. The elder one is a cowman in a faraway village, while the younger one is a policeman. The elder one always feels inferior to the younger one, and he cannot suppress his frustration any more when he finds out that both of them love the same woman. The elder one becomes mad. He rapes and kills the woman, and his crime forces the younger one to fight against his twin brother. The younger one realizes he cannot live in the same world as his brother any more. One of them must be killed. Love, revenge and suffering are treated in an extremely melodramatic way in this ultra-low budget film. What is special in this film is not the story, but how Weerasak tries to tell this story by himself only. Weerasak plays every role in this film. It seems he is his one man crew. He is not only the director, but also the cinematographer, artistic director, editor, etc. on his film. Most of the scenes in this film are made by fixing a camera somewhere and focusing it on Weerasak's face while he delivers his monologue. Some scenes are made by Weerasak holding a camera in his hand at his arm's length in order to let the camera focus on his face. Nearly every scene is shot in his house. Everything in this film is done by him alone.

 

Weerasak is a policeman in his real life and also an award-winning writer. He lives in Ubon Ratchathani, the easternmost province of Thailand. He has been making nearly 20 films, including The Pen (2008, 60 min), another cult hit in which he created memorable soundtrack by himself. Some of his films are about police, for example, Stunned...Crying. Where Is My Mom? (2002, 22 min), which is about a policeman who is abandoned by his wife and tries to raise his son alone; Toughly Innocence (2002, 50 min), which is about a young killer who is chased by a policeman; Dog-Society-Narcotics (2003, 29 min), which is about a crazy policeman who tries to erase crimes from Bangkok; The Free World of Red Sun (2005, 16 min), which is about a son of a murdered policeman; and Illegal Citizens (2009, 24 min), a documentary in which Weerasak interviewed some Laotian suspects who were held in his police station.

 

Weerasak is an ultra-low budget filmmaker with the explosive power of imagination. Most scenes in The Police are the close-ups of his face while he recites his monologues in a straightforward manner, instead of a realistic manner. There are some scenes in The Police which were shot outside his house, but these scenes were not expensively staged. They are just scenes he recorded in places around his house. The images in these scenes are mundane, but when these mundane images appear in the film, they play the role of some specific places assigned by the story. Some images which are inserted into the film are not even concerned with the story. Some scenes seem like shots from a nonsensical home video. Some scenes are just views of roads at night, a secretly recorded footage of a girl crying, or views of various houses. These images which are not related to the story somehow make the story become more convincing. The characteristics described above can also be found in other films by Weerasak.

 

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

39.Zart Tancharoen

 

Zart's first film is Talk Talk Talk (1998, 25 min), which is about four male friends and the gossip that one of their friends is gay. The film is dialogue-based and differs from Zart's later films which focus on romantic relationships, romantic attractions, atmosphere, and some absurd things. The absurd things in his films can be found in Something (2003, 25 min), which is about a man who finds that things around him start to disappear; One One Nueng (2004, 11 min), which deals with a couple whose unsteady relationship is funnily emphasized by the earthquake which happens when they are in bed together; The Air That I Breathe (2005, 18 min), which deals with two pairs of lovers who live in the same building and coincidentally try to commit suicide at the same time; A Same Old Story, As I Thought It Was the Same, But It's Not the Same (2005, 31 min), which deals with a secondhand bookshop owner who falls in love with a customer, but the owner is not sure if the customer is a real person or not, and later the owner becomes unexplainably obsessed with drinking yoghurt; and Lost Nation (2009, 100 min), which is about a man named Chart (Nation) who strangely disappears, while people around him react to his disappearance in various ways.

 

Zart's masterpiece is One Night (2008, 16 min), in which the viewers see something like a lamplight moving around in darkness and hearing some unidentifiable noises for nearly the whole duration of the film. At the end of the film, the viewers see something like a forest at dawn. The film inspires a  lot of imagination and yields various interpretations, including one possible explanation that the film is about rubber tappers in the south of Thailand who are killed by the separatists. The atmospheric quality of One Night can also be found in Zart's The Everlasting Replication of Time (2007, 20 min),

Before Raining (2008, 7 min), and Ferry (2009, 30 min).

 

Zart proves that he excels both in making atmospheric films and narrative films. His best films include Relativity Plus Quantum (2005, 14 min), which has no dialogue and tells an intertwining stories of six villagers; and Brown Sugar: Rug Tong Loon (2010, 38 min), which explores the complicated feelings of a boy and a girl who tease each other and may want to make love.

บทความนี้เขียนขึ้นในช่วงต้นปี 2012

 

Lastly, we would like to emphasize that there are many interesting contemporary Thai film directors who are not mentioned in the list above, because we don't have enough time and ability to write about all of them. The directors who deserve to be written about include Alwa Ritsila, Anucha Boonyawatana, Arpapun Plungsirisoontorn, Chaiwat Wiansantia, Eakalak Maleetipawan, Eakarach Monwat, Hamer Salvala, Janenarong Sirimaha, Meathus Sirinawin, Nok Paksnavin, Palakorn Kleungfak, Patana Chirawong, Pisut Srimork, Prachaya Lampongchat, The Professional Dry Cleaners, Punlop Horharin, Santiphap Inkong-ngarm, Sittipong Patchakao, Sivaroj Kongsakul, Siwadol Rathee, Sompong Soda, Supakit Seksuwan, Suppasit Sretprasert, Tanwarin Sukkhapisit, Taryart Datsathean, Teekhadet Vucharadhanin, Thip Sae-tang, Tossaphon Riantong, Weera Rukbankerd, Wiwat Lertwiwatwongsa, Woratep Tummaoros, etc. We hope some critics will write a few books about them soon.

 

There are also some Thai directors who have been making only a few films, but these films show that the directors have the potential to be big in the future. These Thai directors to watch include Anuchyd Muanprom, Chaisiri Jiwarangsan, Kriangkrai Watananiyom, Nattaphan Boonlert, Pesang Sangsuwan, Phatthi Buntuwanit, Pichanund Laohapornsvan, Pathompon Tesprateep, Prapat Jiwarangsan, Sittiporn Racha, Tanakit Kitsanayunyong, Taweewit Kijtanasoonthorn, Tritos Termarbsri, Ukrit Sa-nguanhai, Vichart Somkaew, Wattanapume Laisuwanchai, etc. We are eagerly awaiting their new films.

----------

ENDNOTES

1) Graiwoot Chulphongsathorn, "A Conversation with Sasithorn Ariyavicha pt.1", CRITICINE (2006):

http://www.criticine.com/interview_article.php?id=28

 

2) Watch Bangkok Blues here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roJhjkX-vr0

 

3) Watch Kissing in Public here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvcaCQAkM6Y

 

4) Read more about Shakespeare Must Die here:

http://behindsmd.blogspot.com/

 

5) Ryan Wells, "Q&A with Film Scholar Nicole Brenez":

http://cinespect.com/?p=3090

 

6) Watch Don't Forget Me here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H30RniAgtHY

 

7) Caroline Lever, "Films on the Rock Yao Noi: Nontawat Numbenchapol":

http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandculture/article/12892/1/film-on-the-rocks-yao-noi-nontawat-numbenchapol

 

8) Watch Thirdworld here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q-umm6nbLs

 

9) Watch O.B.L. here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnU4Op84_Mc

 

10) Read the full interview of Phuttiphong here:

http://v13.videonale.org/en/artist/399-phuttiphong-aroonpheng

 

11) Watch Whispering Ghosts here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBUvdAU5alU

 

12) Watch Glue Boy here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ojgwTalLE

 

13) Watch Damned Life of Yoi here:

http://vimeo.com/9103890

 

14) Watch Mizu here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdRpc3VrnGU

 

15) Watch No One at the Sea here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vB7yCQURj8

 

16) Watch Summer Storm here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6brba_J3e8

 

17) Watch Ageru here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkrgi1wrJMg

 

18) Watch She Is Reading Newspaper here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWwOcpknjLA

 

19) Watch some parts of She Is Reading Newspaper Project here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsmMvMyghvs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1hIZdJEZQE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0IejMutq3I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RJp58Rlgas

 

20) Watch Dad's Picture here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qreeQxYBRB0

 

21) Watch Rise here:

http://vimeo.com/16045450

 

22) Watch Fall here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EjGAeJHSR0

 

23) Watch In Space here:

http://vimeo.com/12750385

-------------------

Wiwat Lertwiwatwongsa / Chulayarnnon Siriphol / Chayanin Tiangpitayagorn / Jit Phokaew / Kanchat Rangseekansong, April 2012

 

Wiwat Lertwiwatwongsa is an experimental filmmaker, film curator, film critic, and writer based in Phuket. His film Own (2009, 5 min) won an award in the 14th Thai Short Film and Video Festival. He wrote a book about Kiyoshi Kurosawa. His blog is here: http://filmsick.wordpress.com/

 

Chulayarnnon Siriphol is an experimental filmmaker who has won many awards in Thailand. His website is here: http://www.chulayarnnon.com/

 

Chayanin Tiangpitayagorn is a film critic based in Bangkok. His blog is here:

http://nanoguy.exteen.com/

 

Jit Phokaew is a cinephile based in Bangkok. His blog is here: http://celinejulie.blogspot.com/

 

Kanchat Rangseekansong is an award-winning film critic, film lecturer, and filmmaker. He wrote a book about Kim Ki-duk. His blog is here: http://www.bloggang.com/mainblog.php?id=merveillesxx