Wednesday, October 09, 2013

A HARBOUR TOWN (2013, Dean Kavanagh, Ireland, A+30)

 
A HARBOUR TOWN (2013, Dean Kavanagh, Ireland, A+30)
 
For me, Kavanagh is an Impressionist filmmaker. Many of his films impress me like Impressionist paintings, because what I love in his films is not the plot, the story, or the dialogue, since these three things are nowhere to be found in many of his films. What I love in his films includes the atmosphere, the light, and the kind of beauty which is semi-natural, semi-abstract.
 
A HARBOUR TOWN makes me think about many things, including:
 
1.One of the things I like very much in this film is that the characters in this film seem to include a few things besides human beings. I think the characters in this film include humidity, the sound of water, and the sound of thunder and the rain. These three things may exist in films by other filmmakers, but they exist as just small elements in those films. In A HARBOUR TOWN, they become very prominent. They seem to be as important as the boy, the bespectacled man, and the character played by Rouzbeh Rashidi in this film.
 
I think HISTORY OF WATER (2012, Dean Kavanagh) and A HARBOUR TOWN are among very few films in this world in which humidity seems to exist as a character. When I watch Kavanagh’s films, I can feel dampness in the air, especially when I hear the sound of water, or see the cloudy sky, or see some waterdrops hanging from branches of a tree, or see the mist in the town, or see the vapor slowly disappearing from a windowpane, or see vapor covering the camera lens.
 
I can’t think of any other films which give prominence to humidity like this. There are some great films which give prominence to the fire, such as THE BURNT-OUT STAR (2012, Teeranit Siangsanoh). There are some great films which give prominence to the snow, such as WINTER REMAINS (2002, Sasithorn Ariyavicha) and SUBURBS OF EMPTINESS (2003, Thomas Koener). There are some great films which give prominence to waterdrops on windowpanes, such as WONDERFUL LIFE (2013, Teeranit Siangsanoh) and BIRTH OF THE SEANEMA (2004, Sasithorn Ariyavicha), but humidity, which is more “invisible” than waterdrops, has rarely been given such prominence as in Kavanagh’s films.
 
Sometimes I wonder if this thing has to do with Ireland, because the damp atmosphere in Kavanagh’s films unintentionally reminds me of the music video IN A LIFETIME (1985) by Clannad & Bono. I like the atmosphere in this music video very much, and I assume that it was shot in Ireland, too.
 
Anyway, the humidity in Kavanagh’s films is one of the things that make his films stand out from many other atmospheric films. I like atmospheric films very much, but some atmospheric films are too similar to one another, especially some Thai atmospheric films made 5-10 years ago.  I think it is because some filmmakers didn’t know what their strong points are when they made those films. That is not the case here. In Kavanagh’s films, you may see the leaves, the trees, the sky, the sea, or the beach like in some other atmospheric films, but the humidity in the air in Kavanagh’s films is the kind of things that you can’t experience from other films.
 
2.I think the sound of water, rain, and thunder in A HARBOUR TOWN is a character, too. This sound is not just a soundtrack, because there are many scenes in this film which make me wonder if the watery sound I hear is directly related to the image I see or not. There are many times which I think I hear the rain, though I’m not sure if it is raining in those scenes or not. There are many times which I think I hear various types of the sound of water, such as the sound of water running down a bathtub hole, or the sound of someone wading through water, but I don’t see images which directly correspond to the sound I hear. The sound of water seems to become an invisible character in the film. In most films, the sound of water is directly related to the images. The sound of water is there to support the images. But in Kavanagh’s films, the sound of water is not there to support the images, but to add another dimension to the images or the films.
 
3.Another thing I like very much in A HARBOUR TOWN is the fact that it arouses me to speculate what the characters think. In this film, the characters don’t talk. We must imagine by ourselves what the characters are thinking in each scene. And there are a few scenes in this film which arouse my imagination very much due to the acting of the actors and the way Kavanagh films these actors. These scenes or moments include the moment when we see the intense face of the boy while he is smoking a cigarette in a garden, the moment when we see the forlorn face of Rashidi while he is looking out a window, and the moment when we see the face of the bespectacled guy while he is meeting a chubby guy in the woods. Does the bespectacled guy feel uncomfortable? The film doesn’t tell us. We must imagine it by ourselves.
 
4.My most favorite scene in A HARBOUR TOWN is the scene in which the bespectacled guy plays accordion on a street at night while the boy is walking around him. I’m not sure why I like this scene the most. I guess it is partly because this scene is not as claustrophobic as other scenes. And it may be because playing accordion on a street feels like releasing something inside the player. I think there are many scenes in this film in which the characters are feeling something strong inside them, but they don’t release their feelings. They hold their feelings inside. But in this accordion scene, it seems some feelings have been released. I also like the presence of the wind in this scene. We can see the hair of the spectacled guy and some parts of the boy’s clothes being blown by the wind in this scene. I just like this kind of atmosphere very much—being caressed by a cold breeze at night in an open space with a friend and the sound of music.
 
5. Another scene that I like very much is the scene in which we see the boy holding a magnifying glass, and then we see the reflection of the camera and the director in the magnifying glass. I like this kind of scenes in which the director reveals himself to us or films himself very much. It seems as if suddenly the fictional world in this film falls apart, and a dimension of reality or half-reality is added.
 
6.Another scene that I like very much is the scene in which we see Rashidi in a building through a purple lens of a camera, but then Rashidi walks toward the camera, and then we see Rashidi holds that camera, while the first person who holds that camera disappears. This scene is very intriguing.
 
7.I think the story about the character played by Rashidi is very interesting. It adds another dimension to the film. Many scenes in the film seem to be about daily life of people in this town and their memories. But scenes about Rashidi are not about daily life or memories. The character Rashidi plays seem to be locked inside a building. He wants to get out, but he can’t. And we see someone crawls quickly after him near the end of this film. This scene seems as if it comes from a horror film. It seems as if the story about this character comes from another film. But I don’t think this character is superfluous. I think if this film is called A HARBOUR TOWN, it is alright to show that there are some people in this town whose lives should be presented in a very different way from other people’s lives.
 
8. There is a thing in this film which I’m not sure is called a zoetrope or not. This thing is made of paper with holes moving around a lamp, yielding beautiful light and shadow in the room. This scene seems like the climax of the film.
 
9.I like the reflections on a glass of water and the reflections on windowpanes in this film very much.
 
10.I also like the narrow vision in some scenes. In some scenes in this film, we see a character through a small, narrow frame. The framing in these scenes are very interesting.
 
11. Some scenes in this film unintentionally remind me of some films that I like, for example:
 
11.1 There is a scene in this film in which the hand of a chacter in a house is elongated so much that it becomes like the hand of an alien. This scene reminds me of HISTORY OF WATER, because there is a scene in HISTORY OF WATER which presents strange sound in a house. This sound makes me imagine that there is an alien hiding inside the house. I like both scenes in these two films very much, partly because both scenes make me feel that there is a world of imagination existing in our daily life.
 
11.2 I also like the scene in which we see the face of the boy illuminated by the flashlight. But this face appears very tiny on the screeen and is surrounded by darkness. This beautiful scene unintentionally reminds me of a scene in FLIGHT OF THE INNOCENT (1993, Carlo Carlei), in which we see the face of the mother surrounded by darkness on the screen.
 
12.If I were rich, I would hold a retrospective of Dean Kavanagh, Rouzbeh Rashidi, Teeranit Siangsanoh, and Wachara Kanha, because I think these four experimental filmmakers are great and there are many things in their films which remind me of one another. Their films seem to have unintentional dialogues with one another. It would be a great fun to compare and contrast their films. For example:
 
12.1 In Kavanagh’s films, we sometimes find a character holding a flashlight searching for something in the dark, especially old photos. It seems this character is in search of old memories.
 
In Teeranit’s films, we often find a character holding a flashlight searching for something in the dark, too, but this kind of scenes often happens in futuristis sci-fi films of Teeranit, and these characters often search for plants and trees, which seem to be rare in the future world.
 
12.2 What I like very much in Kavanagh’s films is the cloudy sky. What I like very much in Teeranit’s films is the night sky.
 
12.3 Both Kavanagh and Teeranit like to incorporate scenes from TV into their films.
 
12.4 I like the extreme close up of human skin and hair in A HARBOUR TOWN very much. It unintentionally reminds me of THOR SOPA (2012, Wachara Kanha).
 
12.5 I also like the sunlight which pierces through the leaves of trees in A HARBOUR TOWN very much. It unintentionally reminds me of RAY OF LIGHT (2012, Wachara Kanha).
 
In conclusion, A HARBOUR TOWN is one of my most favorite films I saw this year, because it makes me feel as if Kavanagh can use a camera like a paintbrush. There are very few filmmakers that I know who can do this.
 
 

Sunday, October 06, 2013

THAILAND AND WALTER RUTTMANN

 
I just noticed that the film MELODY OF THE WORLD (1929, Walter Ruttmann, Germany) presents SIAM or THAILAND and also many other countries in the film.
 
You can watch this film here:
 

Saturday, October 05, 2013

FIVE FILMS WITH FANTASTIC WORLDS

 
There’s a scene in MOOD INDIGO (2013, Michel Gondry, A+15) which unintentionally reminds me of this scene in LE PONT DU NORD (1981, Jacques Rivette).
 
I want to merge the world in MOOD INDIGO with the worlds in the following four films, because all of them are weird and wonderful.
 
1.ALICE (1988, Jan Svankmajer)
 
2.THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUSS (2009, Terry Gilliam)
 
3.THE SADDEST MUSIC IN THE WORLD (2003, Guy Maddin)
 
4.ZAZIE DANS LE METRO (1960, Louis Malle)
 

Favorite Actress: Sa Sittijun – KARAOKE GIRL (2013, Visra Vichit-Vadakan, A+25)


Desirable Actor: Sam Palladio – RUNNER RUNNER (2013, Brad Furman, A+)


Desirable Actor – Supavitch Mepremwattana – KARAOKE GIRL (2013, Visra Vichit-Vadakan, A+25)

 
Desirable Actor – Supavitch Mepremwattana – KARAOKE GIRL (2013, Visra Vichit-Vadakan, A+25)
 
รูปจาก
 

Favorite Actor: James Devereaux – HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND (2013, Rouzbeh Rashidi, A+25)


Thursday, October 03, 2013

HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND (2013, Rouzbeh Rashidi, A+25)

HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND (2013, Rouzbeh Rashidi, A+25)
 
This film makes me think about the following things:
 
1.I like this film very much, because it gives me a strange experience. It shows me stunning images and scenes, without discernible storyline. When I was watching it, I felt a little bit ambiguous. I like the images and sound in this film very much, but I’m not sure if I would have liked it more or not if the film chose to tell a story. This ambiguous feeling is what I rarely experience from other films.
 
At the end it says that this film is a tribute to Jean Rollin. In my opinion,
I think this film is what I want Jean Rollin and Tarsem Singh to do: to make a film purely based on their ability to create stunning images and scenes, but without a story to weigh them down, or without a story to diminish the power of their images.
 
HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND makes me think about many films and many directors for various reasons, especially Tarsem Singh. It makes me think about Tarsem Singh, because I like the images and scenes in SWEET LULLABY (1993, Tarsem), THE CELL (2000, Tarsem), and THE FALL (2006, Tarsem), very much, but THE CELL and THE FALL are a little bit disappointing for me, because the stories in these two films weigh the images down. The stories in these two films are not as powerful as the images. The stories somehow diminish the true power of the images. But SWEET LULLABY, which is a music video, doesn’t have this problem, because it doesn’t focus on telling a story. Its images and scenes can overwhelm me directly.
 
I also think some films by Jean Rollin suffer from the same problem. I like the images and scenes in LE VIOL DU VAMPIRE (1967) and VAMPIRE THRILLS (1970), but I can’t say I’m impressed with the stories in these two films. I think the stories in these two films have a lot to be improved.
 
HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND shows me another way to make a film. It shows how stunning images and scenes can release their full power, without being hidden or obstructed by the stories or the narrative. So this film by Rashidi makes me think about what I would like Jean Rollin and Tarsem to do: to create a film full of stunning images and scenes which are loosely tied together. The film should try to tell no obvious story, but let the viewers imagine the story by themselves if they choose to do so.
 
2.However, telling no story can be both a good thing and a bad thing. Telling no story is the reason why I much prefer HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND to the films by Tarsem and Jean Rollin, but maybe it is also one of the reasons why this film doesn’t overwhelm me completely or make me feel completely involved in the film.
 
While I was watching HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND, I felt a little bit lost or disconnected from the film from time to time. There are two reasons why I feel like this. Firstly, it is because the film doesn’t tell an exciting story. Secondly, it is because some images and scenes don’t inspire me that much.
 
Therefore, though I prefer this film to the films of Tarsem and Jean Rollin, I have to say I may like this film a little bit less than the films of Alain Robbe-Grillet and David Lynch. I think Robbe-Grillet and Lynch are the examples of directors who can combine stunning images with exciting stories. The stories in their films don’t weigh the images down, but serve the images very well, or make the images become more intriguing and powerful. Therefore, while HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND doesn’t suffer from stupid stories or boring stories, the film doesn’t get help from exciting stories, either.
 
3.Though some scenes and images in HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND inspire me to create a story in my own head, I have to say that the images in this film may not correspond totally with my wavelength. I mean the images in this film are stunning and powerful for me, but only to a certain degree. That is not the fault of this film or the director. This thing is about my personal tastes.
 
In a way, I would like to compare HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND with DARK SLUMBER (2013, Teeranit Siangsanoh, 19.30min, A+25) for a few reasons. I would like to show these two films together, because both of them are extremely eerie and atmospheric. Both of them tell no story, and both of them inspire me to create a story in my own head.
 
However, I have to say that the images in DARK SLUMBER correspond to my wavelength a little bit more and scare me more than the images in HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND. The images in DARK SLUMBER are mostly about dark rooms, or rooms in which the light isn’t switched on, in an ordinary building. These images are not as strange as the images in TERRORS OF THE MIND, but maybe that is the reason why these images are more frightening for me. The realistic quality of the images in DARK SLUMBER makes me feel unsafe in real life. DARK SLUMBER makes me realize, or imagine with a great excitement, that there is an unknown danger waiting for me in any ordinary buildings. DARK SLUMBER makes me realize that my ordinary life and the life of characters in a horror film or a thriller film are not that far apart.
 
That is not to say that DARK SLUMBER is a better film than HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND, because I think the filmmakers of these two films have different aims. I don’t think Rashidi wants to simply scare us with this film. What I want to say is just that though both films are extremely eerie without a story, there are some interesting differences between them. DARK SLUMBER is more realistic, so it makes me imagine about danger in my real life, and that’s why it can scare me more than Rashidi’s film. On the other hand, HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND inspires me to think about some fictional stories which may be far from my real life, such as a story about a secret cult or a secret organization which have members all around the world. I also like the beauty of the images in this film very much, but its beautiful colors are not realistic, so the way this film pleases me is different from the way of DARK SLUMBER.
 
In conclusion, DARK SLUMBER pleases me like THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974, Tobe Hooper) or JEEPERS CREEPERS (2001, Victor Salva), because DARK SLUMBER is realistic and raw, while HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND please me like SUSPIRIA (1976, Dario Argento) or RED QUEEN KILLS 7 TIMES (1972, Emilio Miraglia), because it thrills me with its eerie atmosphere and beautiful images. The first group of films makes me want to say, “It’s so exciting and scary.” The second group of films makes me want to say, “It’s so exciting and weirdly beautiful.”
 
4. The scenes which correspond to my wavelength the most in HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND may be the blue scenes of the woman. These scenes inspire my imaginations the most when compared to other scenes in the film. I think it is because I tend to identify myself with a female character, or I tend to imagine a story focusing on strange female characters. This is about my personal tastes, too. Obviously, the film would correspond totally with my wavelength or my imaginative world if the film was full of scenes showing strange female characters doing strange things in eerie landscapes.
 
5. In a way, HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND reminds me of AMER (2009, Hélène Cattet + Bruno Forzani) and A PLACE AMONG THE LIVING (2003, Raoul Ruiz), because HSP seems to play with some elements of genre films like what these two films do. In the case of AMER, it plays with elements of giallo films, and it doesn’t focus on telling a story. What is important in AMER includes the images, the atmosphere, the editing, and a few other elements of giallo films. It excites or thrills us with the styles of giallo films, but not with its own story. As for A PLACE AMONG THE LIVING, it seems to me that the film wants to poke fun at the film-noir genre or wants to have fun with some elements of film noir, instead of trying to impress the audience with its own original story.
 
HSP also doesn’t try to impress us with its own story, but it gives us the eerie atmosphere which can be found in some horror films. In many horror films, the eerie atmosphere is only one element among many other elements, but in HSP, the eerie atmosphere becomes the main focus. That’s why I think HSP should be screened with AMER and DARK SLUMBER, because these three films focus on some interesting elements of horror films.
 
6.Many elements and scenes in HSP also remind me of many other films that I like, for example:
 
6.1 The mask in HSP reminds me of the mask in JUDEX (1963, Georges Franju) and DANGER:DIABOLIK (1968, Mario Bava). The masks in these three films don’t look alike, though.
 
6.2 The eerie atmosphere with the expressive use of beautiful colors reminds me of some European horror films, such as the films of Jean Rollin, Jesus Franco, and DAUGHTERS OF DARKNESS (1971, Harry Kümel).
 
6.3 The scenes of some people who look like moutaineers negotiating some rugged terrains remind me of some eerie films with moutain landscapes, such as THE CURSE (1988, Ralf Huettner, West Germany) and CURSE OF THE ALPS (2010, Michael Steiner, Switzerland).
 
6.4 Some images in this film are partly blurred. Only the center of the images is clear, but other parts of the images are blurred. This style reminds me of POST TENEBRAS LUX (2012, Carlos Reygadas)
 
6.5 The scene in which Maximilian Le Cain brings something to James Devereaux unintentionally reminds me of the scene in MULHOLLAND DRIVE in which a character finds a blue box in her purse. I don’t know why my mind links these two scenes together. I guess it is because these two scenes seem to suggest that the protagonist now finds a way to solve his/her problems, or maybe not. Or it is because these two scenes present a mysterious thing which seems to be very important to the story. But at the end of the film I still don’t know what the thing that Le Cain brings to Devereaux is. I still don’t know what the blue box in MULHOLLAND DRIVE stands for, either.
 
7. I’m not good at listening. So I don’t understand every word that Devereaux says at the beginning of the film. If I hear it correctly, he seems to talk about a bully.
 
I’m not sure who the bully that he talks about is, and I’m not sure if what he says is very important for this film or not. Actually I don’t understand this film at all. But I have some fun trying to think about things like this:
 
7.1 Maybe this character talks about a bully in his life.
 
7.2 Maybe he talks about himself. The bully is his split personality.
 
7.3 Maybe the bully means Hollywood films.
 
7.4 Maybe the bully means “narrative” or “story” which oppresses the images.
 
8. Because this film doesn’t tell an obvious story, it means each viewer can create thousands of different stories out of the scenes or images in this film by themselves. This quality of the film gives me a very unusual viewing experience. While I was watching this film for the first time, I asked myself, “Should I try to give meanings to what I see and hear?” or “Should I just experience it, instead of trying to give meanings to it or creating a story out of it?”
 
While I was watching this film for the first time, I was inspired to create a story out of the scenes that I saw by myself. At first, I tried to imagine a story about a secret cult or a secret organization which have members all around the world. But after a while, I found it too difficult to create a coherent story which can cover all the scenes in HSP satisfyingly. I also realize that while I was trying to give meanings to an image or a scene in this film, it seems as if I have killed some power inside the image. Some images or scenes in this film are very powerful for me, but when I try to use them in a story inside my head, it seems as if some power in these images or scenes have been lost or destroyed.
 
So while I was watching this film for the second time, I didn’t try to imagine a story by myself. I let myself experience the images and sound in this film without trying to impose a story on it. However, I found that this approach to the film gives me a very pleasant experience, but not an extremely ecstatic experience. Like what I said before, I guess it is because the film does not correspond totally with my wavelength. On the other hand, I felt ecstatic while I was watching WINDOWS (1999, Apichatpong Weerasethakul) or ZOETROPE (2011, Rouzbeh Rashidi) without trying to impose a story on them. I guess it is because these two films correspond totally with my wavelength.
 
Anyway, I still like it very much that HSP inspires me to try to approach it with different ways. It is rare to find a film which has this kind of effect on me.
 
9. While I was trying to imagine a story out of HSP, I found that what is interesting is how to link many things in the film together. This act of linking gives me both the joy and the headache. This film inspires me to link:
 
9.1 Various scenes together. It makes me want to find a way to create narrative relationships between these scenes
 
9.2 Various places in the film together. This film seems to shift between many places in the world.
 
9.3 The past and the present. The scenes of some people relocating and the scenes of the mountaineers seem to occur in the past, because the format of these scenes is different from the format of other scenes in the film.
 
9.4 The inside and the outside of the characters. There are many scenes in HSP which make me question if they happen inside the characters’ heads or not.
 
In conclusion, this aspect of HSP somehow makes me think about the power of cinema, especially the shift of space and time in cinema.
 
10. HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND also reminds me of L’EXPERIENCE PREHISTORIQUE (2003-2008, Christelle Lheureux, 80min). L’EXPERIENCE PREHISTORIQUE is a silent film with no story of its own, but more than ten writers from all over the world were invited to create a story of their own out of this same film. When it was shown in Bangkok, Prabda Yoon, a famous Thai writer, created a story out of this film. His story is about a Japanese family who is anxiously awaiting news about one of its member who is taken hostage in Iraq (if I remember it correctly). When it was shown in other countries, the story of the film changed according to different writers, though all images in the film stayed the same each time it was shown.
 
I guess HSP can be adapted into a project like L’EXPERIENCE PREHISTORIQUE. I guess many viewers of HSP might be inspired like me to create a story of their own out of this film, especially young viewers whose imagination are not too bound by logic and reasons. However, these viewers might experience difficulty like me, because it is very difficult to link all these things in the film together.
 
In conclusion, I think HSP is powerful and great as it is, without an obvious story in it. But it is also a great fun to try to create a story of your own out of it. Anyway, sometimes I wonder if the will to impose a narrative on this film is “the terrors of the mind” or not.
 
11.If I have to create a story out of HSP, what would I create? What is my imaginative story inspired by this film? My imagination inspired by this film is about a secret cult like the one in the novel FLICKER by Theodore Roszak. This cult, which originated a few thousand years ago, is trying to locate two old 16mm films: one is about a mountain trip, the other is about a family’s relocation, because these two old films contain some secrets which will lead to a sacred thing or the treasure that the cult is trying to find. The search for these two old films and ultimately the sacred thing brings the cult members to various places around the world. Devereaux may play a secret agent from the government who is trying to infiltrate this cult. The woman in blue scenes may be the real leader of this cult. However, I wonder how I can connect the scene of the guy who talks about “smelling” to this story. Hahaha.
 
12.HSP also inspires me to think about a story about some mental landscapes. Many scenes in this film are surrealistic because they are presented in strange colors. I think these scenes may happen in a character’s mind, instead of happening in reality. So I also imagine a story in which there maybe only one or two real characters, and the other characters are in fact the split personalities of Devereaux’s character, or something like that.
 
In this aspect, HSP reminds me of some films which deal with mental landscapes, such as films by Faozan Rizal, THE CELL, DREAMCATCHER (2003, Lawrence Kasdan), DREAMTRIPS (1999, Kal Ng, Hong Kong, 90min), eXistenZ (1999, David Cronenberg), IDENTITY (2003, James Mangold), INCEPTION (2010, Christopher Nolan), MIDNIGHT RAINBOW (2008, Patha Thongpan), PACIFIC RIM (2013, Guillermo Del Toro), and UNTIL THE END OF THE WORLD (1991, Wim Wenders). I like this kind of films very much.
 
13.I also like the two special ways HSP uses while changing from one scene to another: one way is by the flickering of the images, the other way is by showing us a pool of messy colors.
 
In conclusion, HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND makes me think about the marriage between stunning images and stories. There are failed marriages, such as in some films by Jean Rollin and Tarsem Singh. There are successful marriages, such as in films by David Lynch and Alain Robbe-Grillet. There are also cases in which the story decides appropriately to stay single, such as in LE CAMION (1977, Marguerite Duras), DEAD MAN’S STORY (2012, Thanapruet Prayoonprom), and TEN TINY LOVE STORIES (2002, Rodrigo Garcia), because these films don’t try to depict the stories the films tell, but focusing on the act of telling instead. And there are also wonderful cases in which the stunning images decide appropriately to stay single, such as in TAKE THE 5:10 TO DREAMLAND (1976, Bruce Conner), DARK SLUMBER, and HSP: THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE TERRORS OF THE MIND.
 
 

Wednesday, October 02, 2013

ODD AND EVENTS (2013, Palida Dumrongthaveesak, 30min, A+30)


ODD AND EVENTS is now available online in Thai without subtitles.

 


ไม่มีใครปกติ? (2013, ปาลิดา ดำรงทวีศักดิ์) ชอบความโรคจิตของหนังเรื่องนี้มากๆ และชอบการใช้เพลงประกอบในช่วงท้ายของหนังมากๆด้วย :-)

Tuesday, October 01, 2013

MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND PART 4


The article MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND PART 4 is now published in the website Experimental Conversations. This final part is about Teeranit Siangsanoh, Ukrit Sa-nguanhai, Viriyaporn Boonprasert, Vorakorn Ruetaivanichkul, and Wichanon Somumjarn. Thanks a lot to my friends who wrote this article with me.


 

MYSTERIOUS OBJECTS FROM THAILAND PART 1


 

PART 2


 

PART 3


 

Favorite Music Videos 63: DREAM PHONE – E.M.M.A


ชอบมิวสิควิดีโอนี้มาก ดูแล้วให้ความรู้สึกเหมือนมันเป็นผ้าสีขาวที่โดนสีจากผ้าอื่นๆตกใส่ในขณะซักผ้า