I AM A VERY BIASED PERSON

This is my comment in BIOSCOPE WEBBOARD
http://www.bioscopemagazine.com/smf/index.php?topic=492.0

About YEMAR 2, I just noticed that there’s a big dog doll in the room of the police. It’s in the background of the police officers. I guess it’s the same doll which appears as a character (?) in DHAMMA (2007, Wattana Rujirojsakul, A+).

This is just my useless observation. I just love the big dog doll in DHAMMA very much. In that film, it was treated as if it was an injured living dog which a monk tries to heal. So I am glad to see it again in YEMAR 2. These two films also share the same leading actor. The monk in DHAMMA is the big police in YEMAR 2. I’m not sure if he is Wattana or not, but I think he is a great character actor.

The big dog doll in YEMAR 2 seems to serve no obvious purpose in the film. If it doesn’t appear in the film, the film will not change a little bit. However, I’m still very glad to see it.

This is in contrast with other films, in which the placing of objects seems to have some special meanings, such as the book DEATH NOTE which appears on the foreground of a scene in ALONE.

There’s another thing that I like in ALONE very much. It’s the friend of the heroine. She seems to contradict herself within a few seconds. She is the one who put some supernatural beliefs into the heroine’s head by suggesting that the call might be from the grave. But a few seconds later she suggests to the heroine that the ghost might be just an imagination. I think this friend is very funny.

The call from the grave in ALONE also reminds me of a scene in THE PHANTOM OF LIBERTY (Luis Bunuel, A+), while the ending of NORTH COLD (2007, Veramon Liptawat, A+) also reminds me of the ending of an Eric Rohmer’s film.

Sometimes I don’t understand myself. When I saw that Eric Rohmer’s film, the little twist at the end which gives a new romantic hope to the heartbroken heroine is not what I really like. I think it’s a kind of giving false hope to the audience. I wish Eric Rohmer didn’t end the film like that. But when I see the same ending appears in NORTH COLD, I just love it very much. Why is my feeling so different for the same kind of scene, for the same kind of ending, appearing in two different films. I guess it just shows that I am a very biased person, or I am very prejudiced. The main difference between the two films is just that Rohmer’s film is about heterosexuals, while NORTH COLD is about homosexuals and bisexuals. I seem to feel awkward with a happy ending in films about heterosexuals, but feel so glad with a happy ending in films about bisexuals. I can never be objective.



THIS IS MY COMMENT IN NEW SCREENOUT WEBBOARD
http://www.xq28.net/wow/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=192&p=33214#p33214


ยินดีกับคุณ sensitiveman ด้วยค่ะที่ได้สัมผัสกับหนุ่มยูเครน

วันนี้ขอแวะเข้ามาเชียร์ให้ไปดูหนังสั้นเรื่อง “ความลักลั่นของงานรื่นเริง” (THE BANGKOK BOURGEOIS PARTY) (2007, Prap Boonpan, 29 min, A++++++++++) ค่ะ หนังเรื่องนี้จะเปิดฉายในวันนี้เวลา 18.10-20.10 น. ที่โรงภาพยนตร์แกรนด์อีจีวี สยามดิสคัฟเวอร์รี่ โรงที่ 3 บัตรราคา 60 บาท THE BANGKOK BOURGEOIS PARTY เป็นหนังไทยที่ดิฉันชอบมากที่สุดในปีนี้ค่ะ

ดูรายละเอียดโปรแกรมการฉายได้ที่
http://www.bioscopemagazine.com/smf/index.php?topic=492.0


เมื่อวานนี้ได้ดูหนังเกย์ของไทยเรื่อง NORTH COLD (2006, Veramon Liptawat, 24 min, A+++++) หรือ “หนาวเหนือ” ชอบสุดๆเลยค่ะ หนังอาจจะไม่ได้ดีอะไรมากนัก แต่เป็นหนังที่ตอบสนองกิเลสของดิฉันได้อย่างดีมากๆ และตัวละครในหนังเรื่องนี้ก็เหมือนเพื่อนสนิทของดิฉันอย่างมากๆ