Showing posts with label CONCEPTUAL ART. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CONCEPTUAL ART. Show all posts

Saturday, July 11, 2026

WE WILL BE TOUCHING DOWN SHORTLY

 

ไม่รู้เหมือนกันครับว่าเขาคือใคร

 

ปี 2005 ทาง World Film Festival of Bangkok มีฉายหนังของผู้กำกับเหล่านี้ด้วย

 

1. German Kral (CUBAN MUSIC)

2. Josue Mendez (DAYS OF SANTIAGO)

3. Karen Shakhnazarov (A RIDER NAMED DEATH)

4. Emmanuel Carrere (THE MOUSTACHE)

5. Ismael Ferroukhi (GRAND VOYAGE)

6. Semih Kaplanoglu (ANGEL’S FALL)

7. Tómas Vorel (THE IMP)

8. Carlos Reygadas (BATTLE IN HEAVEN)

9. Caveh Zahedi (I AM A SEX ADDICT)

10. Dan Wolman (BEN’S BIOGRAPHY)

 

แต่เช็คดูแล้ว ผู้ชายในรูปไม่น่าจะเป็นผู้กำกับเหล่านี้ 555

+++

 

หอเย็นสีเทา (1953, น. ประภาสถิต) น่าอ่านมาก ๆ เลยครับ กรี๊ดดดดดดดดดดดด

+++

 

ใครที่เป็นแฟนคลับของหนังเรื่อง WITTGENSTEIN (1993, Derek Jarman, UK) ก็เหมาะจะซื้อหนังสือเล่มนี้มาอ่านประกอบการดูหนังด้วยนะ

+++

 

หนึ่งในงานศิลปะที่เราชอบมากที่สุดในปี 2026 ก็คือ WE WILL BE TOUCHING DOWN SHORTLY (2026, Elaine W. Ho) ในนิทรรศการ OFF-SIGHT ที่ Storage คือพอเราเข้าไปในนิทรรศการนี้ แล้วดู brochure มันก็บอกว่า มีงานชิ้นนี้อยู่ในห้องนี้ เราก็เลยเข้าไปในห้อง ก็เจอแต่ห้องโล่ง ๆ ตามภาพแรกที่เราลงไว้ เหมือนในห้องมีภาพถ่ายเล็ก ๆ อะไรไม่รู้ติดอยู่ ซึ่งเราก็ไม่รู้ว่าเป็นภาพถ่ายที่ค้างมาจากนิทรรศการก่อนหน้านี้หรือเปล่า เราก็เลยไม่แน่ใจ ส่วนตัวห้องนั้นก็โล่ง ๆ เหมือนมีน้ำเจิ่งนองอยู่บนพื้นห้อง เราก็เลยเดาว่ามันคงเป็นน้ำฝนที่สาดเข้ามา หรือไม่ก็น้ำที่รั่วมาจากชั้นบน

 

เราอ่าน brochure ที่บรรยายถึงตัวงาน WE WILL BE TOUCHING DOWN SHORTLY แต่อ่านไม่รู้เรื่องเลย 555 เราก็เลยไปถามเจ้าหน้าที่ว่า ตัวงานนี้มันอยู่ตรงไหน ฉันเห็นแต่ห้องโล่ง ๆ เจ้าหน้าที่ก็เลยตอบว่า มันคือน้ำตาลที่ราดไว้บนพื้นห้อง หรืออะไรทำนองนี้ เราก็เลยเดาว่า น้ำตาลดังกล่าวมันคงเปลี่ยนสถานะกลายเป็นของเหลว หรือกลายเป็นน้ำเชื่อมไปแล้ว

 

เราก็เลยกลับเข้าไปเพ่งดูแอ่งน้ำที่เจิ่งนองบนพื้นห้องนั้น แล้วก็พบว่า มันไม่ใช่น้ำฝนจริง ๆ ด้วย แต่มันเป็นน้ำเชื่อมเหนียว ๆ เหนอะ ๆ และบางจุดก็มีมดเดินกันขวักไขว่ เราต้องระวังไม่ให้เดินเหยียบมด

 

เราก็เลยประทับใจงานชิ้นนี้มาก ๆ

 

นิทรรศการ OFF-SIGHT นี้หมดไปแล้วนะ แต่เราเพิ่งมีเวลาลงรูป

+++

 

SUPER NON-BINARY

 

พอเราดูหนังเรื่อง SUPERGIRL (2026, Craig Gillespie, A+10) จบแล้ว เราก็เลยสงสัยว่า มีคนสร้างหนังเรื่อง SUPER NON-BINARY แล้วยัง เราก็เลย search ดู แล้วก็พบว่า ยังไม่มีคนสร้างหนังเรื่องนี้ แต่มันมีตัวละคร superheroes หลายตัวที่เป็น non-binary ซึ่งเราไม่เคยรู้มาก่อน น่าสนใจมาก ๆ เหมือนตัวละครเหล่านี้ส่วนใหญ่ปรากฏแค่ในรูปแบบการ์ตูนหรือ TV animation แต่ยังไม่ได้กลายเป็นตัวละครในภาพยนตร์ด้วยนะ

 

NON-BINARY SUPERHEROES

(ข้อมูลพวกนี้มาจาก Google + AI นะ เราไม่รับประกันความถูกต้องใด ๆ ทั้งสิ้น)

 

1. Charli Ramsey ค่าย Marvel

2. Morph ค่าย Marvel

3. Snowflake ค่าย Marvel

4. The Aerie ค่าย DC

5. Circuit Breaker ค่าย DC

6. Kid Quick ค่าย DC

++++

เราชอบ THE 36TH CHAMBER OF SHAOLIN (1978, Lau Kar-leung) อย่างรุนแรงสุดขีด

+++

 

เราว่าหนังที่พอจะใกล้เคียงกับ SOS ก้าวผิด ชีวิตเปลี่ยน ได้บ้างนิดนึง ก็คือ “ผีเบล” (2025, Stephen Yip) เพราะว่า “ผีเบล” มันเต็มไปด้วยการทำผิด cinematic grammar ในหลาย ๆ ฉากเหมือน ๆ กัน มันก็เลยมีความฮาอยู่บ้าง แต่ตัวละคร + เนื้อเรื่องใน “ผีเบล” มันไม่ได้ท้าทายตรรกะเหตุผลของมนุษย์มากเท่ากับ SOS เพราะฉะนั้นระดับความฮาของผีเบลก็เลยด้อยกว่า SOS อยู่มากเหมือนกัน

+++

 

THE FRIENDS (1994, Shinji Somai, Japan, A+30)

 

ดูแล้วร้องห่มร้องไห้หนักมาก ๆ Shinji Somai โคตรเทพ กราบตีน Shinji Somai

 

เราได้ดูหนังของ Shinji Somai ไปเพียงแค่ 6 เรื่อง กราบตีนเขาอย่างรุนแรง ตอนนี้ตัดสินไม่ได้จริง ๆ ว่าชอบหนังของเขาเรื่องไหนมากที่สุดระหว่าง THE FRIENDS, MOVING (1993) กับ TYPHOON CLUB (1985)

Thursday, March 20, 2008

FIFTEENTH POLL: MOCKUMENTARIES OR MY ALARMING INABILITY TO DISTINGUISH FACT FROM FICTION

My fifteenth poll is inspired by one of my most favorite films in February 2008. It’s a short film I saw in the art exhibition called WANTANEE RETROSPECTIVE ENCORE (2008, Wantanee Siripattanantakul), which is a part of a group exhibition called PARADISE ENGINEERING (curated by Chattiya Nitpolprasert) at Art Center Chula. I don’t know if this short film has its own name or not. I just know that this short film was first shown as a part of a solo exhibition called A WANTANEE RETROSPECTIVE last year. So I apply the name of the first exhibition as the name of this short film.

When I went to see PARADISE ENGINEERING, I watched this short film on a TV. I don’t remember its exact details. I apologize in advance if I remember anything wrongly. This short film looks like a TV documentary made by Arte France. It consists of some foreign artists talking about Wantanee Siripattanantakul, claiming she is one of the most important artists in Europe. It also shows some clips from Wantanee’s previous videos. It seems Wantanee has made many artful videos in the past. The exhibition also displays details of her previous works in large letters on the wall. It seems she took part in many famous art exhibitions. Her works were shown in many galleries around the world. She is included in the book ART NOW or something like that. I was a bit surprised when I found that the exhibition also told us where or which gallery would display her work in 2009 or 2010. I had never thought a gallery would plan some exhibitions for one or two years in advance.

I thought this exhibition was a bit boring. How could a list of artist’s works or a list of galleries showing the artist’s work be interesting? Why didn’t the exhibition show the artist’s works? It showed only the list of works, but didn’t show the works. However, I thought this exhibition was very useful, because at least it introduced me to Wantanee. I had never heard the name of this important Thai video artist before.

A few days later, one of my friends asked me if I could make a list of several Thai video artists for him. I tried to make a list, including Araya Rasdjarmrearnsook, Montri Toemsombat, etc. Then I thought about Wantanee. Judging from the short film I saw, she seemed to be very famous. Maybe I should include her name in the list. I googled her name, finding nearly no result. Why couldn’t I find any information about one of the most important artists in Europe on the internet? I asked myself. Suddenly I understood why.


THESE FILMS MAY BE MOCKUMENTARIES. WHICH FILM DO YOU LIKE?

1.THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT (1999, Daniel Myrick, Eduardo Sanchez, USA)

2.CLOVERFIELD (2008, Matt Reeves, USA)

3.DAVID HOLZMAN’S DIARY (1967, Jim McBride, USA)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062864/

http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/c7/81/803eeb6709a0038aa9f91110.L.jpg

4.F FOR FAKE (1974, Orson Welles)

5.FORGOTTEN SILVER (1995, Costa Botes, Peter Jackson, New Zealand)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/514H6MMZTPL._SS500_.jpg

6.HOW TO MAKE A GOOD ART FOR GET WIN AWARD (Vasan Sitthiket, Thailand)

7.INTERVIEW (2003, Jeanne Faust, Germany)
I really believed this was an actual interview, a real documentary. But the information on the internet told us that the film is staged.
http://www.artfacts.net/index.php/pageType/exhibitionInfo/exhibition/16005


8.KOMBI NATION (2003, Grant Lahood, New Zealand)
I believed this was a real documentary when I was watching the first part of this film. Only when things started to get weird that I came to realize that this is a mockumentary.

9.THE LOVE MACHINE (1999, Gordon Eriksen, USA)
Many viewers, including me, really believed this film is a real documentary. We came to realize that the film is fictional when we saw the ending credit.

10.LUDWIG’S COOK (1973, Hans-Juergen Syberberg, West Germany)

11.MAN BITES DOG (1992, Remy Belvaux, Andre Bonzel, Benoit Poelvoorde, Belgium)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103905/

12.MY LITTLE EYE (2002, Marc Evans, UK)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51BGRQ45KDL._SS500_.jpg

13.SERIES 7: THE CONTENDERS (2001, Daniel Minahan, USA)

14.SURF’S UP (2007, Ash Brannon, Chris Buck, USA)

15.TEN TINY LOVE STORIES (2001, Rodrigo Garcia, USA)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0301924/
I believed this film is a real documentary. When I was watching this film, I wondered why some women had such vivid memory, why they remembered some details in the past very vividly. I don’t have a good memory like that. But I still believed everything they said is true. A few days later, I talked about this film with Sonthaya Subyen, and he told me that the film is fictional.

16.A TOUGH CREATURE WHO BURDENS THE EARTH (2004, Paisit Panpruegsachart, Thailand)
The first part of this film is undoubtedly mockumentary. It shows a Thai film director being interviewed by an alien. The second part of this film, which shows him and his film crew being questioned by the police, is a real documentary. The next part of this film, which shows him and his girlfriend going upcountry, looks like a real documentary. It is so natural, so life-like. Many viewers also thought like me. We believed the rural part of this film was a real documentary.

After the film, there was a Q&A with the director, we were totally surprised to learn that the whole rural part is fictional, though there were some improvised moments.

I don’t know the official English title of this film. The official Thai title of this film is SAT WIBAK NAK LOK, which can be literally translated as A TOUGH CREATURE WHO BURDENS THE EARTH.

I don’t know which year I should apply to this film. I think this film was finished in 2004, but it got a world premiere at Bioscope Magazine office in 2008. I don’t know if I should use the year 2004 or 2008 for this feature film.


17.…UNPRONOUNCABLE IN THE LINGUISTIC IMPERIALISM OF YOURS (2008, Ratchapoom Boonbunchachoke, Thailand)

This film shows an interview with a female Thai artist. For the first half of this film, my friend and I believed it was a real documentary. We only came to realize that this film is a mockumentary when the artist starts talking about her masturbation show.


18.UOD DEE (ARROGANT) (2003, Sompot Chidgasornpongse, Thailand)
I wrote about this film a few months ago. At that time I transcribed the title of this film as AOD DEE.
http://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2007/09/pariya-wongrabiab-is-thai-stephane.html


19.A WANTANEE RETROSPECTIVE (2007, Wantanee Siripattananantakul, Thailand)


20.WELCOME TO HOLLYWOOD (2000, Tony Markes, Adam Rifkin, USA)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0169376/
This film really looks like a real documentary. I like Angie Everhart in this film very much.

You can cast multilpe votes.

Have you ever been fooled by any mockumentaries?

---------------------------------


--WANTANEE RETROPECTIVE ENCORE shows me how blind I was. There are many clues which hint that the entire exhibition, or the entire biography of Wantanee, is fictional, but I overlooked them. This exhibition, including its short mockumentary, gives me the great lesson of this year: I am unable to distinguish fact from fiction, and I should not overlook any details.

--I think WANTANEE RETROSPECTIVE ENCORE (2008) is the restaging of the exhibition A WANTANEE RETROSPECTIVE (2007), which I didn’t visit. There was a seminar on A WANTANEE RETROSPECTIVE. The details of the seminar in Thai can be read at:
http://www.thaicritic.com/wantanee.htm

In the seminar, Jakapan Vilasineekul commented that the exhibition A WANTANEE RETROSPECTIVE was aimed at the viewers who already had some knowledge in art, and compared this exhibition to some works of Michael Asher, because some of Asher’s exhibitions can only be appreciated by people who already had some knowledge in art, too. One of the most interesting exhibitions of Asher is the one he did for the museum in Bern in 1980. His exhibition consisted of removing all heaters in the museum building and putting them outside, so that the viewers would realize that heaters or anything in an art exhibition, are actually parts of the language of the artist, not just the artworks shown.


--You can view some works of Jakapan Vilasineekul here:
http://www.rama9art.org/artisan/2005/october/recent/exhi.html


--Some information on Michael Asher can be found in the book CONCEPTUAL ART by Daniel Marzona. Here are some excerpts from the book:

“In 1969 Asher publicly exhibited one of his AIRWORKS for the first time at the group exhibition THE APPERING/DISAPPEARING IMAGE/OBJECT. In the vicinity of the entrance zone a fan, not visible to the public, generated between the ceiling and the floor a constant flow of air, which could be transversed by visitors to the exhibition.”

“In 1973, in the Galleria Franco Toselli in Milan, ….He decided on the spot to remove the white paint from all the walls and ceilings of the gallery with a sand-blaster. Beneath the many coats of the white paint, the brown plaster eventually came to light, and with it the various alterations to the building that had been undertaken over the years.”

“Asher himself pointed to the central aspect of the work when he observed: “Traditionally, the white interior of a commercial gallery presented an artist’s production within an architectural setting of false autonomy. If, through its abstinence, the viewer was reminded of the white paint, an interesting question was then raised: How does the white ‘partition’ of paint affect the context of art usually seen on that support surface?””

You can buy the book CONCEPTUAL ART here.
http://www.amazon.com/Conceptual-Art-Basic-S/dp/3822829625/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1206026590&sr=1-1







Friday, February 29, 2008

THE REAL THING AND ITS REPRESENTATION

This is my reply to Matthew Hunt in my blog with some added information:
http://celinejulie.blogspot.com/2008/02/film-wish-list-slow-slidings-of.html

I didn’t understand ONE AND THREE PANS (1965, Joseph Kosuth) when I saw it in ARTSPACE GERMANY. Fortunately, someone wrote about it and her writing makes me appreciate this work much more than before.
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/monnita/2008/01/26/entry-1

This is what Monnita wrote:

“His work of 'One and Three Pans' appears to echo his other work of "One and Three Chairs" made in the same year. Here, he displayed a photograph of a pan, an actual pan, and a dictionary of the word "pan". The piece distinguishes between the three aspects involved in the perception of a work of art: the visual representation of a thing (the photograph of the pan), its real referent (the actual pan), and its intellectual concept (the dictionary definition). Reality, image, and concept: the three "sides" of a perceived thing. ”


--I haven’t seen anything like ONE AND THREE PANS before—the juxtaposition between “the real thing”, “its representation” and “its concept”. However, the juxtaposition between the real thing and its representation reminds me of many things I like, including:

1.RE-PRESENTATION (2007, Chai Chaiyachit + Chisanucha Kongwailap, A+)

This short film is about a man gaining some knowledge on arts and Thai politics. Since I have no knowledge in these two areas, the film introduces me to some ideas which I find very interesting. This film makes me wonder if “Thai democracy” is the representation of “something essentially undemocratic”.

2.DESIRE (2001, Fred Kelemen, A+)

This is a stage play directed by Fred Kelemen. The videotape of this stage play was shown at Thammasat University Library last year. One interesting thing in this stage play is the difference between “the real thing” and “its projection” (I don’t know if I use the right English word or not.) In this play, Eben hates Abbie whenever Abbie appears as a real person in front of him. But sometimes Abbie appears on some giant screens hanging on the stage. Whenever Abbie appears on the screen and talks to Eben, Eben seems to like her. In conclusion, it seems as if Eben hates Abbie as a real person, but he loves her projection and desires her projection.

3.THE ALL-ROUND REDUCED PERSONALITY (1977, Helke Sander, A+)

There’s one scene I love in this film. It is the scene in which three woman carry a giant photo of a part of the Berlin Wall and place this giant photo next to that exact part of the Berlin Wall. We see two doubling images at the same time, side by side—the real Berlin Wall and its photo. I don’t understand what this scene means, but I love it.

--Talking about Joseph Kosuth reminds me that I have no knowledge at all about conceptual art. As for some concepts or ideas found in films, I think I like some ideas or concepts in the films of Tulapop Saenjaroen. I think you saw one of his films last year—WHEN THE MOVIE LISTENS (2007, A+). The idea of this film is to let each viewer talk anything he/she wants to talk to the film, and the film will listen to us. I just saw his new film several weeks ago. It is called 2008, and lasts about 3 minute. In this film, we saw nothing except some strange sentences in “the ending credit”. At first I misunderstood that this film is the ending credit of another short film shown before it, but after the film ends, I got to understand that “the ending credit” is actually “the film”.

--Talking about some concepts in art, I like the concept of an artwork by Rirkrit Tiravanija very much. I saw a videotape recording of his artwork last year. In this video, he presented “rice” at an art exhibition and treated the rice as if the rice was a very precious diamond.

-------------------------


--You can see the image from my favorite scene in THE ALL-ROUND REDUCED PERSONALITY here:
http://www.umass.edu/defa/filmtour/redupers.shtml

Timothy Corrigan described this great scene in his book called NEW GERMAN FILM: THE DISPLACED IMAGE (1983).

This is a quote from the book:

“At another extraordinary point, however, the women carry the photo into a cinematic frame that replicates the very scene and angle of the photo, setting the image against the same wall that divides the center of the photographic space. The result is much more than a postmodern play with mise-en-abyme; it becomes rather a temporary but trenchant measure of imagistic difference as depth. Here the empty geometry of this street scene—which had developed a certain dynamic across the tension of the wall dividing those spaces—receives a critical turn through its doubling in the hands of the three women. What is added in the difference between the two representations of the scene is the self-consciousness of the image as always dramatizing a distance from a “real” scene or another image of it and the presence of a specific time and point of view (these three women again in this place) as the determination of the “depth” which that particular temporal and spatial position creates in distinguishing itself.”